3M Company vs Nomura Holdings Inc — how do they compare? 3M Company trades at $170.8 (market cap $82.99B), while Nomura Holdings Inc trades at $9.4 (market cap $27.46B). The key difference: 3M Company is far larger — about 3× Nomura Holdings Inc's market cap, and Nomura Holdings Inc pays the higher dividend (3.45%). Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| MMM | NMR | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $82.99B | $27.46B |
Sector | Industrials | Financials |
52-Week High | $174.61 | $10.04 |
52-Week Low | $141.10 | $6.39 |
Enterprise Value | $91.39B | — |
Dividend Yield | 1.96% | 3.45% |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
3M (MMM) surged 6.83% to $170.76 following strong Q2 2026 earnings that beat expectations, with the company raising full-year guidance. Technical indicators show a bullish trend with support at $158 and resistance at $161. Fundamentally, the company demonstrates robust profitability with 39.71% gross margins and 72.14% ROE, though revenue has declined from 2022 peaks. Recent news highlights operational improvements and growth in Safety & Industrial and Transport & Electronics segments.
The outlook is positive with earnings momentum and raised guidance, but risks include litigation liabilities and macroeconomic headwinds. Analyst consensus is mixed with 48% buy ratings but a $149.75 price target below current levels, suggesting limited near-term upside despite strong operational performance.
No Aura AI signal available yet.
Trailing returns across standard periods
Latest headlines on both assets
3M Company conducts operations in electronics, telecommunications, industrial, consumer and office, health care, safety, and other markets. The Company businesses share technologies, manufacturing operations, marketing channels, and other resources. 3M serves customers worldwide.
Read more on MMM →Nomura is Japan's largest broker, about twice the size of rival Daiwa Securities and roughly three times the size of the securities units of the three megabanks. It is also the largest asset-management company in Japan, with a similar size differential compared with its rivals. Despite its topnotch brand name in retail broking and asset management in Japan, Nomura has struggled to compete effectively in the institutional securities business against larger global rivals. In 2008, Nomura bought European and Asian assets of the failed Lehman Brothers, which led to a sharply higher cost base but did not provide commensurate revenue. Nomura has reduced the scale of these businesses but maintains its ambition to compete globally with the top players.
Read more on NMR →