Compare McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) vs United States Natural Gas Fund (UNG) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
McCormick & Company, Incorporated vs United States Natural Gas Fund — how do they compare? McCormick & Company, Incorporated trades at $51.5 (market cap $13.96B), while United States Natural Gas Fund trades at $10.02. The key difference: McCormick & Company, Incorporated pays a 3.7% dividend while United States Natural Gas Fund pays none, and McCormick & Company, Incorporated is trading nearer its 52-week high, United States Natural Gas Fund nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| MKC | UNG | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $13.96B | — |
Sector | Consumer Staples | Commodities - Energy |
52-Week High | $71.65 | $16.90 |
52-Week Low | $45.60 | $9.63 |
Enterprise Value | $18.57B | — |
Dividend Yield | 3.7% | — |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
MKC trades at $51.90, down 0.35% with a bearish technical signal. The stock shows strong fundamentals with a low P/E of 8.64, robust 21.91% net margin, and consistent revenue growth to $6.84B in 2025. Recent Q1 2026 earnings beat expectations, while analyst consensus is mixed with 36.67% buy ratings. The pending Unilever merger and upcoming Q3 2026 earnings on October 1, 2026, are key catalysts.
MKC presents a value opportunity with attractive valuation metrics and solid profitability, though technical indicators suggest near-term pressure. The Unilever deal integration and margin expansion potential support long-term growth, but execution risks and competitive pressures remain concerns. Current price sits near the analyst low target of $52.00, offering limited downside protection.
UNG trades at $10.46, down 0.95% with a bearish technical signal from moving averages. The ETF faces headwinds from high natural gas production and storage levels, though weather-driven demand provides some support. Recent EIA forecasts project record natural gas supply and demand through 2027, creating a mixed fundamental backdrop for this futures-based commodity ETF.
The outlook remains challenged by oversupply concerns, though long-term demand growth from LNG exports and data center power needs offers potential upside. Key risks include commodity price volatility and the structural limitations of futures-based ETFs versus equity-based alternatives like FCG.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About McCormick & Company, Incorporated
In its 130-year history, McCormick has grown to become the leading global manufacturer, marketer, and distributor of spices, herbs, extracts, seasonings, and other flavorings. Beyond end consumers, McCormick's customer base also includes top quick-service restaurants, retail grocery chains, and other packaged food and beverage manufacturers, with about 30% of sales generated beyond its home turf to include 150 other countries and territories. In addition to its namesake brand, the firm's portfolio includes Old Bay, Zatarain's, Thai Kitchen, Frank's RedHot, French's, and the recently acquired Cholula brand.
Read more on MKC →About United States Natural Gas Fund
UNG is a commodity ETF that tracks the daily price movements of natural gas futures. It primarily invests in front-month contracts at the Henry Hub, making it a highly volatile tool for short-term trading rather than long-term holding due to contango and roll costs.
Read more on UNG →
