Investment
Features
FeesSafety
Academy
More
Pluang+

Compare McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) vs New York Times Co (NYT) Price & Performance

McCormick & Company, IncorporatedTrade
New York Times CoTrade

Price performance (Past 24H)

Key statistics

McCormick & Company, Incorporated vs New York Times Co — how do they compare? McCormick & Company, Incorporated trades at $51.43 (market cap $13.96B), while New York Times Co trades at $66.8 (market cap $10.96B). The key difference: McCormick & Company, Incorporated is the larger of the two by market cap, and McCormick & Company, Incorporated pays the higher dividend (3.7%). Which is the better fit depends on your goals.

MKCNYT
Market Cap
$13.96B$10.96B
Sector
Consumer StaplesMedia
52-Week High
$71.65$85.86
52-Week Low
$45.60$54.66
Enterprise Value
$18.57B$10.36B
Dividend Yield
3.7%1.35%

Aura AI Summary

Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice

McCormick & Company, Incorporated

McCormick & Company (MKC) trades at $51.90, down 0.35% with a bearish technical signal. The stock shows strong fundamentals with a P/E of 8.64, net income margin of 21.91%, and consistent dividend growth. Recent Q1 2026 earnings beat expectations, while analyst consensus remains mixed with 11 buy, 17 hold, and 2 sell ratings. The pending $65 billion Unilever Foods merger and London listing plans represent significant corporate developments.

MKC presents a compelling value opportunity with attractive valuation metrics and stable profitability. The Unilever merger offers substantial growth potential but carries integration risks. Current technical weakness near support at $50-$51 creates a potential entry point for long-term investors seeking dividend income and merger upside.

New York Times Co

The New York Times Company (NYT) trades at $67.96, up 1.01% today, with a neutral technical signal and mixed moving averages. Recent earnings have consistently beaten estimates, with Q2 2026 EPS of $0.69 exceeding the $0.663 forecast. Revenue growth is steady, rising from $2.3B in 2022 to $2.8B in 2025, with net profit margins improving to 12.17%. The company maintains strong cash flow from operations at $584.49M in 2025. Analyst consensus is a $76.00 price target, though the majority recommend Hold.

Outlook remains cautiously optimistic given earnings momentum and solid fundamentals, but risks include the ongoing OpenAI copyright lawsuit and competitive pressures in digital media. The stock offers potential upside to the consensus target, supported by institutional buying interest, though sentiment is tempered by regulatory and litigation uncertainties.

Returns comparison

Trailing returns across standard periods

Top news

Latest headlines on both assets

About McCormick & Company, Incorporated

In its 130-year history, McCormick has grown to become the leading global manufacturer, marketer, and distributor of spices, herbs, extracts, seasonings, and other flavorings. Beyond end consumers, McCormick's customer base also includes top quick-service restaurants, retail grocery chains, and other packaged food and beverage manufacturers, with about 30% of sales generated beyond its home turf to include 150 other countries and territories. In addition to its namesake brand, the firm's portfolio includes Old Bay, Zatarain's, Thai Kitchen, Frank's RedHot, French's, and the recently acquired Cholula brand.

Read more on MKC

About New York Times Co

New York Times Co is an American media company known for publishing its flagship newspaper, The New York Times. The company also operates the International New York Times newspaper, as well as digital properties such as nytimes and various smartphone applications. Circulation of The New York Times is the source of revenue for the company, followed by print and digital advertising and its paid digital-only subscription to The New York Times. The company has a daily print circulation of over 500,000 and 1,000,000 on Sundays. The source of growth for The New York Times is its digital subscription service, which has over 1,000,000 paid users.

Read more on NYT