Moody's Corporation vs Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF — how do they compare? Moody's Corporation trades at $458.77 (market cap $77.87B), while Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF trades at $28.29 (market cap $347.46M). The key difference: Moody's Corporation is far larger — about 224.1× Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's market cap, and Moody's Corporation pays a 0.92% dividend while Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Moody's Corporation for 132 Days and Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF for 46 Days on average.
| MCO | PBW | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $77.87B | $347.46M |
Volume | 633,412 | 413,698 |
Sector | Financials | Sector/Thematic |
52-Week High | $539.61 | $46.99 |
52-Week Low | $412.23 | $28.29 |
Typical Hold Time | 132 Days | 46 Days |
Enterprise Value | $83.89B | — |
Dividend Yield | 0.92% | — |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Moody's Corporation (MCO) trades at $458.69, up 1.41% with strong fundamentals including 34.25% net income margin and 80.15% ROE. The stock shows bearish technical signals but has consistently beaten earnings estimates in recent quarters. Recent developments include a minority stake acquisition in Philippine Rating Services and continued leadership in risk analytics, with the company ranking #1 in Chartis RiskTech100 for the fifth consecutive year.
Despite technical weakness, Moody's maintains strong profitability and analyst support with 56% buy ratings and a $536.40 consensus target. Key risks include high valuation multiples and potential market volatility, but the company's dominant market position and consistent earnings growth support long-term investment appeal.
PBW, the Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF, trades at $28.92, down 2.89% today amid a bearish technical signal from moving averages. The ETF's unique selection criteria prioritize ecological factors over financial metrics, resulting in concentrated exposure to the clean energy sector. Recent institutional selling, including a 96.3% reduction by IFP Advisors Inc. in Q2 2026 (SEC filing, September 18, 2026), reflects cautious sentiment despite long-term growth drivers like energy security and data center demand.
Outlook remains challenged by near-term volatility and sector underperformance versus broad markets, though global investment in clean energy offers structural tailwinds. Key risks include oil price swings, Fed policy impacts, and lack of diversification. Investors face a trade-off between speculative growth potential and elevated sensitivity to macroeconomic shifts.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Moody's, along with S&P Ratings, is a leading provider of credit ratings on fixed income securities. Moody's ratings segment, known as Moody's Investors Service or MIS, includes corporates, structured finance, financial institutions, and public finance ratings. MIS represents a majority of the firm's revenue and profits. Moody's other segment is Moody's Analytics and consists of Research, Data, and Analytics or RD&A and Enterprise Risk Solutions or ERS. RD&A's products include credit research, quantitative credit scores, economic research, business intelligence, know your customer (KYC) tools, commercial real estate data and analytical tools, and training services. ERS includes risk management software solutions to financial institutions.
Read more on MCO →PBW is an equal-weighted ETF that invests in U.S. companies leading the clean energy transition. It focuses on renewable energy, power conservation, and sustainable technologies like solar, wind, and energy storage.
Read more on PBW →