iShares MSCI China ETF vs Yum! Brands, Inc. — how do they compare? iShares MSCI China ETF trades at $53.9, while Yum! Brands, Inc. trades at $148 (market cap $40.62B). The key difference: Yum! Brands, Inc. pays a 2.04% dividend while iShares MSCI China ETF pays none, and Yum! Brands, Inc. is trading nearer its 52-week high, iShares MSCI China ETF nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| MCHI | YUM | |
|---|---|---|
Sector | Broad Market / Factor | Consumer Cyclical |
52-Week High | $66.99 | $168.16 |
52-Week Low | $50.48 | $138.21 |
Market Cap | — | $40.62B |
Enterprise Value | — | $51.88B |
Dividend Yield | — | 2.04% |
Trailing returns across standard periods
Latest headlines on both assets
MCHI is an ETF that seeks to track the investment results of the MSCI China Index. It provides broad exposure to the Chinese equity market, primarily focusing on large and mid-cap companies listed in Hong Kong and Shanghai. MCHI serves as a core holding for investors looking to gain diversified exposure to the performance and growth potential of the companies within the People's Republic of China.
Read more on MCHI →Yum Brands is a U.S.-based restaurant operator featuring a portfolio of four brands: KFC (26,930 global units), Pizza Hut (18,380 units), Taco Bell (7,790 units), and The Habit Burger (310 units) at year-end 2021. With $58 billion in 2021 systemwide sales, the firm is the second-largest restaurant company in the world, behind McDonald's ($112.5 billion) but ahead of Restaurant Brands International ($36 billion) and Starbucks ($25 billion). Yum is 98% franchised, with the largest franchisee, Yum China, created via a 2016 spinoff transaction (after which Yum China agreed to pay 3% royalties to Yum Brands in perpetuity). Yum is the newest evolution of Tricon Brands, formerly a division of PepsiCo, and generates the bulk of its revenue from franchise royalties and marketing contributions.
Read more on YUM →