Compare iShares MBS ETF (MBB) vs Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
iShares MBS ETF vs Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF — how do they compare? iShares MBS ETF trades at $89.7 (market cap $35.45B), while Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF trades at $28.29 (market cap $347.46M). The key difference: iShares MBS ETF is far larger — about 102× Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's market cap, and Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF is more actively traded (413,698 versus 4,982,386). Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold iShares MBS ETF for 96 Days and Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF for 46 Days on average.
| MBB | PBW | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $35.45B | $347.46M |
Volume | 4,982,386 | 413,698 |
Sector | Fixed Income | Sector/Thematic |
52-Week High | $96.91 | $46.99 |
52-Week Low | $89.09 | $28.29 |
Typical Hold Time | 96 Days | 46 Days |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
MBB, the iShares MBS ETF, trades at $89.22, down 0.16% on the day, with a bearish technical signal from moving averages and oscillators showing mixed signals. The ETF faces headwinds from rising intermediate-term rates and inflation, as noted in recent analysis, while short interest has surged significantly. Recent corporate actions include scheduled dividend payments, but key financial ratios are not available in the provided data.
The outlook for MBB is cautious due to interest rate sensitivity and convexity risks in the mortgage-backed securities market. Investment opportunities exist for income-focused investors attracted to its dividend yield, but risks include further rate hikes and prepayment volatility. Investors should weigh the ETF's role in a diversified fixed income portfolio against potential duration-related losses.
PBW, the Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF, trades at $28.92, down 2.89% today amid a bearish technical signal from moving averages. The ETF's unique selection criteria prioritize ecological factors over financial metrics, resulting in concentrated exposure to the clean energy sector. Recent institutional selling, including a 96.3% reduction by IFP Advisors Inc. in Q2 2026 (SEC filing, September 18, 2026), reflects cautious sentiment despite long-term growth drivers like energy security and data center demand.
Outlook remains challenged by near-term volatility and sector underperformance versus broad markets, though global investment in clean energy offers structural tailwinds. Key risks include oil price swings, Fed policy impacts, and lack of diversification. Investors face a trade-off between speculative growth potential and elevated sensitivity to macroeconomic shifts.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
About iShares MBS ETF
The fund will invest at least 80% of its assets in the component securities of the underlying index and TBAs that have economic characteristics that are substantially identical to the economic characteristics of the component securities of the index, and the fund will invest at least 90% of its assets in fixed income securities included in the underlying index that advisor believes will help the fund track the index.
Read more on MBB →About Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF
PBW is an equal-weighted ETF that invests in U.S. companies leading the clean energy transition. It focuses on renewable energy, power conservation, and sustainable technologies like solar, wind, and energy storage.
Read more on PBW →
