Compare Matson Inc (MATX) vs Yum China Holdings Inc (YUMC) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Matson Inc vs Yum China Holdings Inc — how do they compare? Matson Inc trades at $226.38 (market cap $6.81B), while Yum China Holdings Inc trades at $43.1 (market cap $14.11B). The key difference: Yum China Holdings Inc is far larger — about 2.1× Matson Inc's market cap, and Yum China Holdings Inc pays the higher dividend (2.78%). Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Matson Inc for 23 Days and Yum China Holdings Inc for 77 Days on average.
| MATX | YUMC | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $6.81B | $14.11B |
Volume | 255,080 | 2,350,650 |
Sector | Industrials | Consumer Cyclical |
52-Week High | $238.60 | $57.95 |
52-Week Low | $88.05 | $39.98 |
Typical Hold Time | 23 Days | 77 Days |
Enterprise Value | $7.41B | $15.02B |
Dividend Yield | 0.67% | 2.78% |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Matson (MATX) trades at $222.92, down 0.83% on the day, with technical indicators showing a neutral to bearish short-term bias. The company demonstrates strong fundamental performance with consistent earnings beats, including Q2 2026 EPS of $4.27 versus $3.79 expected, and maintains healthy profitability with a 13.41% net income margin. Recent news highlights institutional buying interest and positive analyst sentiment toward the transportation services sector.
MATX presents a compelling investment case with solid earnings growth, attractive valuation metrics (P/E of 15.37), and strong analyst support (66.7% buy ratings). Key risks include freight market volatility and competitive pressures, but the company's raised full-year outlook and dividend payments provide stability. The stock offers potential upside with Wall Street analysts projecting 27.3% price target upside.
YUMC trades at $42.99, up 5.76% today, with a bearish technical signal but strong fundamentals. Recent earnings beats and a 73.68% analyst buy consensus highlight positive momentum. The company completed the Pizza Hut China brand acquisition and expanded its Burger Bar concept, signaling growth initiatives. Cash flow from operations remains robust at $1.47B for 2025, though net cash flow is negative due to financing activities.
The outlook is mixed: solid earnings growth and expansion potential support upside, but technical weakness and competitive pressures pose risks. Investors should weigh the attractive valuation (P/E 15.3) against near-term price volatility and market sentiment headwinds.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
About Matson Inc
Matson, Inc. is an American shipping and logistics company primarily operating in the Pacific. The company provides ocean transportation services, including container, automobile, and general cargo, particularly between the U.S. West Coast, Hawaii, Alaska, and Guam. Matson also offers logistics services, including warehousing, less-than-container load (LCL) consolidation, and supply chain management, making it a critical service provider for businesses operating across the Pacific region.
Read more on MATX →About Yum China Holdings Inc
With almost 10,600 units and USD 9.5 billion in systemwide sales in 2020, Yum China is the largest restaurant chain in China. It generates revenue through its own restaurants and franchise fees. Key concepts include KFC (7,166 units) and Pizza Hut (2,355), but the company's portfolio also includes other brands such as Little Sheep, East Dawning, Taco Bell, Huang Ji Huang, COFFii & Joy, and Lavazza (collectively representing about 985 units). Yum China is a trademark licensee of Yum Brands, paying 3% of total systemwide sales to the company it separated from in October 2016.
Read more on YUMC →
