Investment
Features
FeesSafety
Academy
More
Pluang+

Compare Marathon Digital Holdings Inc (MARA) vs Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLP) Price & Performance

Marathon Digital Holdings IncTrade
Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR FundTrade

Price performance (Past 24H)

Key statistics

Marathon Digital Holdings Inc vs Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund — how do they compare? Marathon Digital Holdings Inc trades at $9.65 (market cap $3.83B), while Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund trades at $83.43 (market cap $13.50B). The key difference: Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund is far larger — about 3.5× Marathon Digital Holdings Inc's market cap, and Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund is trading nearer its 52-week high, Marathon Digital Holdings Inc nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Marathon Digital Holdings Inc for 22 Days and Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund for 72 Days on average.

MARAXLP
Market Cap
$3.83B$13.50B
Volume
47,742,69814,599,953
Sector
Financials—
52-Week High
$22.84$90.00
52-Week Low
$6.73$75.61
Typical Hold Time
22 Days72 Days
Enterprise Value
$5.87B—

Aura AI Summary

Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice

Marathon Digital Holdings Inc

MARA trades at $9.91, down 4.34% today, with a bearish technical outlook despite some oversold RSI readings. The company faces severe profitability challenges with a net income margin of -429.71% and negative cash flow from operations of $802.73M in 2025. Recent earnings misses and declining revenue from $907M in 2025 to $804M in 2026 highlight operational struggles, though analyst consensus remains divided with a $13 price target.

The stock presents high risk due to persistent losses and negative cash generation, offset by potential upside if operational efficiency improves. Investors face volatility from Bitcoin sector exposure and regulatory uncertainty, requiring careful risk assessment despite Wall Street's mixed but leaning positive ratings.

Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund

XLP trades at $83.42, up 2.11% with a bullish technical signal supported by moving averages and oscillators. The ETF shows strong relative performance against discretionary peers, gaining 6.6% year-to-date while XLY declined over 7%. Analyst consensus is unanimously bullish with 100% buy ratings. Recent news highlights XLP's defensive characteristics amid economic uncertainty and its competitive expense ratio advantage over peer funds.

The outlook remains positive given XLP's defensive positioning in consumer staples, low 0.08% expense ratio, and strong technical momentum. However, risks include sensitivity to interest rate movements and potential consumer spending slowdown. The ETF's proximity to resistance at $84 suggests near-term consolidation may precede further upside if bullish momentum persists.

Returns comparison

Trailing returns across standard periods

Investor sentiment on Pluang

What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days

MARA
78% Buy22% Sell
Avg holding period · 22 Days
XLP
100% Buy0% Sell
Avg holding period · 72 Days

Top news

Latest headlines on both assets

About Marathon Digital Holdings Inc

Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. is one of the largest publicly traded Bitcoin mining companies in North America. The company focuses on building and operating large-scale, cost-efficient Bitcoin mining facilities. Marathon's strategy centers on increasing its mining hash rate and using sustainable energy sources to expand its Bitcoin production. The company's performance is closely tied to the price of Bitcoin and the overall health of the digital asset mining industry.

Read more on MARA →

About Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund

In seeking to track the performance of the index, the fund employs a replication strategy. It generally invests substantially all, but at least 95%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. The index includes companies that have been identified as Consumer Staples companies by the GICS®. It is non-diversified.

Read more on XLP →