Marathon Digital Holdings Inc vs TeraWulf Inc — how do they compare? Marathon Digital Holdings Inc trades at $9.65 (market cap $3.83B), while TeraWulf Inc trades at $13.77 (market cap $6.81B). The key difference: TeraWulf Inc is the larger of the two by market cap, and Marathon Digital Holdings Inc is more actively traded (47,742,698 versus 45,841,998). Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Marathon Digital Holdings Inc for 22 Days and TeraWulf Inc for 17 Days on average.
| MARA | WULF | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $3.83B | $6.81B |
Volume | 47,742,698 | 45,841,998 |
Sector | Financials | Financials |
52-Week High | $22.84 | $28.98 |
52-Week Low | $6.73 | $10.99 |
Typical Hold Time | 22 Days | 17 Days |
Enterprise Value | $5.87B | $9.43B |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Marathon Digital Holdings (MARA) trades at $9.65, down 6.85% in the last session, reflecting ongoing volatility. The stock shows mixed signals with bearish technical indicators but positive analyst sentiment. Recent earnings have consistently missed expectations, with Q2 2026 EPS of -$1.60 versus expected $0.17. Despite negative profitability metrics, the company maintains strong analyst coverage with a consensus price target of $13.25, suggesting 37% upside potential from current levels.
MARA presents a high-risk opportunity with significant divergence between fundamental performance and market expectations. While valuation ratios appear attractive (P/E 3.37, EV/EBITDA 3.31), persistent negative earnings and cash flow challenges create substantial execution risk. The stock's performance remains heavily dependent on broader market sentiment and the company's ability to improve operational efficiency amid competitive pressures.
TeraWulf (WULF) trades at $13.77, down 4.38% on the day, amid a bearish technical signal and weak fundamentals. The company reported a net loss of $661.42 million in 2025 with a negative net income margin of -1,179.94%, while revenue was $168.46 million. Recent news highlights volatility tied to AI infrastructure trends, with shares reacting to sector-wide moves and analyst coverage initiations.
Despite unanimous analyst buy ratings and a $34.92 consensus price target implying significant upside, high valuation ratios and persistent losses pose substantial risks. Investment appeal hinges on successful execution of the AI data center strategy, but cash flow challenges and competitive pressures require careful monitoring.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Latest headlines on both assets
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. is one of the largest publicly traded Bitcoin mining companies in North America. The company focuses on building and operating large-scale, cost-efficient Bitcoin mining facilities. Marathon's strategy centers on increasing its mining hash rate and using sustainable energy sources to expand its Bitcoin production. The company's performance is closely tied to the price of Bitcoin and the overall health of the digital asset mining industry.
Read more on MARA →TeraWulf develops, owns, and operates fully integrated digital infrastructure powered by predominantly zero-carbon energy. It utilizes a hybrid business model that combines industrial-scale Bitcoin mining with high-performance computing (HPC) and AI hosting, leveraging sustainable power sources like nuclear and hydroelectric to deliver low-cost, energy-efficient data center solutions.
Read more on WULF →