Compare Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) vs Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF vs Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund — how do they compare? Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF trades at $73.72 (market cap $5.78B), while Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund trades at $112.75 (market cap $21.89B). The key difference: Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund is far larger — about 3.8× Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF's market cap, and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF is trading nearer its 52-week high, Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF for 36 Days and Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund for 114 Days on average.
| MAGS | XLY | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $5.78B | $21.89B |
Volume | 4,410,665 | 5,690,342 |
Sector | Sector/Thematic | — |
52-Week High | $73.90 | $124.52 |
52-Week Low | $55.39 | $105.64 |
Typical Hold Time | 36 Days | 114 Days |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF) trades at $73.63, down slightly by 0.08% with a bullish technical signal from moving averages. The ETF provides equal-weighted exposure to seven mega-cap tech leaders, though it has underperformed the broader market in 2026 with only 2% year-to-date gains. Recent news highlights ongoing investor debate about the Magnificent Seven's leadership role amid shifting AI investment trends.
The ETF faces near-term pressure from underperformance versus the S&P 500 but maintains long-term growth potential through diversified tech exposure. Key risks include concentration in seven stocks and market rotation away from mega-caps, while the bullish technical setup suggests potential for near-term recovery if AI momentum continues.
XLY trades at $112.66, up 1.17% with a bullish technical signal despite mixed momentum indicators. The ETF shows underperformance versus consumer staples in 2026, declining over 7% while facing inflation pressures on discretionary spending. Analyst consensus remains unanimously bullish with 100% buy ratings, though technical resistance at $113 presents near-term challenges.
The outlook remains cautiously optimistic given strong analyst support and potential holiday sales growth, but persistent inflation and sector underperformance versus the broader market pose significant headwinds. Key risks include consumer spending shifts toward value and concentration in top holdings like Amazon and Tesla.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
About Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
MAGS is an ETF that provides concentrated exposure to the seven technology-focused mega-cap companies often referred to as the 'Magnificent Seven' (Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta, Microsoft, NVIDIA, and Tesla). The fund is designed to capture the performance of these market-leading stocks, which have been the primary drivers of market returns. It offers a simple way for investors to invest solely in this select group of high-growth technology companies.
Read more on MAGS →About Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund
In seeking to track the performance of the index, the fund employs a replication strategy. It generally invests substantially all, but at least 95%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. The index includes securities of companies from the following industries: retail; hotels, restaurants and leisure; textiles, apparel and luxury goods; household durables; automobiles; auto components; distributors; leisure products; and diversified consumer services. It is non-diversified.
Read more on XLY →
