Investment
Features
FeesSafety
Academy
More
Pluang+

Compare Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) vs Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLV) Price & Performance

Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETFTrade
Health Care Select Sector SPDR FundTrade

Price performance (Past 24H)

Key statistics

Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF vs Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund — how do they compare? Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF trades at $73.73 (market cap $5.78B), while Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund trades at $170.81 (market cap $43.48B). The key difference: Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund is far larger — about 7.5× Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF's market cap, and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF is trading nearer its 52-week high, Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF for 36 Days and Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund for 100 Days on average.

MAGSXLV
Market Cap
$5.78B$43.48B
Volume
4,410,66511,121,431
Sector
Sector/Thematic—
52-Week High
$73.90$175.68
52-Week Low
$55.39$141.95
Typical Hold Time
36 Days100 Days

Aura AI Summary

Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice

Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF

MAGS trades at $73.03, down 0.9% today, with a bullish technical signal from moving averages and neutral oscillators. The ETF provides equal-weighted exposure to the Magnificent Seven tech stocks, though 2026 performance has been muted with a 2% year-to-date gain as the group faces increased competition and AI spending pressures. Recent news highlights both the long-term AI growth theme and near-term underperformance versus the broader market.

The outlook hinges on AI-driven earnings growth from its mega-cap holdings, but concentration risk and shifting investor sentiment pose challenges. Upside potential exists if the Magnificent Seven reassert leadership, while downside risks include prolonged sector rotation and margin compression from heavy capital expenditure.

Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund

XLV trades at $168.16, down 0.39% with a bearish technical signal from moving averages. The healthcare ETF maintains strong cost advantages with a 0.08% expense ratio compared to peers. Recent news highlights XLV's defensive positioning during market volatility and its historical outperformance during Fed rate hikes. Technical indicators show RSI levels in neutral territory while ADX signals selling pressure.

XLV offers diversified healthcare exposure with competitive expense ratios, positioning it well for defensive investing. Key risks include political uncertainty around healthcare policy and concentrated exposure to domestic S&P 500 stocks. The ETF's low-cost structure and sector diversification provide stability amid market volatility, though technical indicators suggest near-term caution.

Returns comparison

Trailing returns across standard periods

Investor sentiment on Pluang

What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days

MAGS
0% Buy100% Sell
Avg holding period · 36 Days
XLV
44% Buy56% Sell
Avg holding period · 100 Days

About Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF

MAGS is an ETF that provides concentrated exposure to the seven technology-focused mega-cap companies often referred to as the 'Magnificent Seven' (Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta, Microsoft, NVIDIA, and Tesla). The fund is designed to capture the performance of these market-leading stocks, which have been the primary drivers of market returns. It offers a simple way for investors to invest solely in this select group of high-growth technology companies.

Read more on MAGS →

About Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund

In seeking to track the performance of the index, the fund employs a replication strategy. It generally invests substantially all, but at least 95%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. The index includes companies from the following industries: pharmaceuticals; health care equipment & supplies; health care providers & services; biotechnology; life sciences tools & services; and health care technology. The fund is non-diversified.

Read more on XLV →