Compare Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) vs Waste Management, Inc. (WM) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF vs Waste Management, Inc. — how do they compare? Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF trades at $73.73 (market cap $5.78B), while Waste Management, Inc. trades at $208.83 (market cap $83.98B). The key difference: Waste Management, Inc. is far larger — about 14.5× Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF's market cap, and Waste Management, Inc. pays a 1.8% dividend while Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF for 36 Days and Waste Management, Inc. for 130 Days on average.
| MAGS | WM | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $5.78B | $83.98B |
Volume | 4,410,665 | 2,182,180 |
Sector | Sector/Thematic | Industrials |
52-Week High | $73.90 | $246.51 |
52-Week Low | $55.39 | $196.77 |
Typical Hold Time | 36 Days | 130 Days |
Enterprise Value | — | $106.78B |
Dividend Yield | — | 1.8% |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF) trades at $73.73, showing minimal daily movement with a 0.05% gain. Technical indicators signal a bullish trend with strong moving average support, while oscillators remain neutral. The ETF provides equal-weighted exposure to seven mega-cap tech leaders, though it has underperformed the broader market in 2026 with only 2% year-to-date gains compared to S&P 500 strength.
Outlook remains cautiously optimistic given AI-driven growth potential, but concentration risk and underperformance versus diversified indexes present challenges. Key risks include tech sector volatility and shifting investor preferences away from the Magnificent Seven theme toward broader market exposure.
Waste Management (WM) trades at $208.83, showing minimal daily movement with a slight decline of 0.05%. The stock maintains strong profitability metrics including a 29.83% ROE and 11.12% net margin, though valuation ratios appear elevated with a P/E of 29.72. Recent earnings show mixed performance with two beats and one miss in the last three quarters. Technical indicators suggest a bullish overall signal despite bearish moving averages, with key support at $208 and resistance at $212.
WM demonstrates resilient fundamentals with steady revenue growth and strong cash flow generation, though elevated debt levels and tight liquidity present concerns. Analyst consensus remains positive with 54% buy ratings and no sell recommendations. The company's essential service business model provides defensive characteristics, but investors should monitor debt management and competitive pressures in the waste management sector.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
MAGS is an ETF that provides concentrated exposure to the seven technology-focused mega-cap companies often referred to as the 'Magnificent Seven' (Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta, Microsoft, NVIDIA, and Tesla). The fund is designed to capture the performance of these market-leading stocks, which have been the primary drivers of market returns. It offers a simple way for investors to invest solely in this select group of high-growth technology companies.
Read more on MAGS →About Waste Management, Inc.
Waste Management ranks as the largest integrated provider of traditional solid waste services in the United States, operating approximately 260 active landfills and about 340 transfer stations. The company serves residential, commercial, and industrial end markets and is also a leading recycler in North America.
Read more on WM →
