Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF vs Under Armour Inc Class A — how do they compare? Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF trades at $73.77 (market cap $5.78B), while Under Armour Inc Class A trades at $4.96 (market cap $2.07B). The key difference: Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF is far larger — about 2.8× Under Armour Inc Class A's market cap, and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF is trading nearer its 52-week high, Under Armour Inc Class A nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF for 36 Days and Under Armour Inc Class A for 99 Days on average.
| MAGS | UAA | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $5.78B | $2.07B |
Volume | 4,410,665 | 12,050,442 |
Sector | Sector/Thematic | Consumer Cyclical |
52-Week High | $73.90 | $8.14 |
52-Week Low | $55.39 | $4.17 |
Typical Hold Time | 36 Days | 99 Days |
Enterprise Value | — | $3.05B |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF) trades at $73.63, down slightly by 0.08% with a bullish technical signal from moving averages. The ETF provides equal-weighted exposure to seven mega-cap tech leaders, though it has underperformed the broader market in 2026 with only 2% year-to-date gains. Recent news highlights ongoing investor debate about the Magnificent Seven's leadership role amid shifting AI investment trends.
The ETF faces near-term pressure from underperformance versus the S&P 500 but maintains long-term growth potential through diversified tech exposure. Key risks include concentration in seven stocks and market rotation away from mega-caps, while the bullish technical setup suggests potential for near-term recovery if AI momentum continues.
Under Armour (UAA) trades at $4.94, up 2.49% today, as the company navigates a challenging turnaround. Recent earnings show mixed results with Q2 2026 beating expectations but Q1 2026 missing, while technical indicators show a bullish trend despite negative profitability metrics. The company faces revenue declines but maintains margin improvement focus, with analyst consensus leaning toward Hold amid ongoing transformation efforts.
The outlook remains cautious with revenue weakness offset by cost discipline. Investment opportunity exists if margin gains translate to sustained profitability, but risks include persistent demand softness and high debt levels. Current valuation appears reasonable with P/S of 0.42, though negative ROE and net margins warrant careful monitoring of the brand transformation progress.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
MAGS is an ETF that provides concentrated exposure to the seven technology-focused mega-cap companies often referred to as the 'Magnificent Seven' (Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta, Microsoft, NVIDIA, and Tesla). The fund is designed to capture the performance of these market-leading stocks, which have been the primary drivers of market returns. It offers a simple way for investors to invest solely in this select group of high-growth technology companies.
Read more on MAGS →Under Armour develops, markets, and distributes athletic apparel, footwear, and accessories in North America and other territories. Consumers of its apparel include professional and amateur athletes, sponsored college and professional teams, and people with active lifestyles. The company sells merchandise through direct-to-consumer, including e-commerce and more than 400 combined factory house and brand house stores, and wholesale channels. Under Armour also operates a digital fitness app called MapMyFitness. The Baltimore-based company was founded in 1996.
Read more on UAA →