Compare Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) vs Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF vs Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF — how do they compare? Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF trades at $73.75 (market cap $5.78B), while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF trades at $309.41 (market cap $113.40B). The key difference: Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF is far larger — about 19.6× Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF's market cap, and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF is more actively traded (4,410,665 versus 2,866,236). Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF for 36 Days and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF for 54 Days on average.
| MAGS | QQQM | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $5.78B | $113.40B |
Volume | 4,410,665 | 2,866,236 |
Sector | Sector/Thematic | Broad Market / Factor |
52-Week High | $73.90 | $312.76 |
52-Week Low | $55.39 | $229.87 |
Typical Hold Time | 36 Days | 54 Days |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
MAGS trades at $73.66, showing minimal daily movement with a slight 0.04% decline. Technical indicators signal a bullish trend with strong moving average support, while oscillators remain neutral. The ETF provides equal-weighted exposure to the Magnificent Seven mega-cap tech stocks, though recent performance has trailed broader market indexes with modest 2% year-to-date gains.
The outlook remains cautiously optimistic given the ETF's concentrated tech exposure and AI growth themes. Key risks include market concentration, valuation concerns, and potential regulatory scrutiny. Wall Street sentiment appears mixed as investors weigh long-term AI potential against near-term performance challenges.
QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) trades at $309.27, down 0.88% on the day, with a bullish technical signal from moving averages. The ETF tracks the NASDAQ-100 index with a low 0.15% expense ratio. Recent institutional buying includes QRG Capital Management increasing its position by 207.5% during Q2 2026. Technical indicators show support at $305 and resistance at $311, with neutral oscillator readings suggesting balanced momentum.
The outlook remains positive given the NASDAQ-100's growth exposure and cost efficiency versus QQQ. Risks include market concentration in technology stocks and potential volatility from macroeconomic factors. Institutional accumulation and favorable expense structure support long-term positioning, though investors should monitor index composition changes and broader market trends.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
MAGS is an ETF that provides concentrated exposure to the seven technology-focused mega-cap companies often referred to as the 'Magnificent Seven' (Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta, Microsoft, NVIDIA, and Tesla). The fund is designed to capture the performance of these market-leading stocks, which have been the primary drivers of market returns. It offers a simple way for investors to invest solely in this select group of high-growth technology companies.
Read more on MAGS →About Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
QQQM is an ETF designed to track the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It provides exposure to the 100 largest non-financial companies listed on the NASDAQ. Positioned as a lower-cost and more long-term-investor-friendly alternative to its peer QQQ, QQQM offers the same fundamental market exposure but typically has a lower share price and is structured to appeal to investors focused on accumulation rather than active trading.
Read more on QQQM →
