Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF vs Direxion NASDAQ 100 Equal Weighted Index Shares — how do they compare? Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF trades at $73.75 (market cap $5.78B), while Direxion NASDAQ 100 Equal Weighted Index Shares trades at $121.85 (market cap $1.45B). The key difference: Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF is far larger — about 4× Direxion NASDAQ 100 Equal Weighted Index Shares's market cap, and Direxion NASDAQ 100 Equal Weighted Index Shares is more actively traded (323,568 versus 4,410,665). Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF for 36 Days and Direxion NASDAQ 100 Equal Weighted Index Shares for 48 Days on average.
| MAGS | QQQE | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $5.78B | $1.45B |
Volume | 4,410,665 | 323,568 |
Sector | Sector/Thematic | Broad Market / Factor |
52-Week High | $73.90 | $124.69 |
52-Week Low | $55.39 | $96.06 |
Typical Hold Time | 36 Days | 48 Days |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF) trades at $73.73, showing minimal daily movement with a 0.05% gain. Technical indicators signal a bullish trend with strong moving average support, while oscillators remain neutral. The ETF provides equal-weighted exposure to seven mega-cap tech leaders, though it has underperformed the broader market in 2026 with only 2% year-to-date gains compared to S&P 500 strength.
Outlook remains cautiously optimistic given AI-driven growth potential, but concentration risk and underperformance versus diversified indexes present challenges. Key risks include tech sector volatility and shifting investor preferences away from the Magnificent Seven theme toward broader market exposure.
QQQE trades at $121.92 with minimal daily movement (+0.02%). Technical indicators show a bullish trend with moving averages supporting upward momentum while oscillators remain neutral. The ETF's equal-weighted approach to NASDAQ-100 stocks provides diversification benefits, reducing technology concentration from 60% to 45% compared to market-cap weighted alternatives. Recent analysis suggests QQQE offers stronger fundamentals and technicals than QQQ for tactical positioning.
The outlook appears favorable with equal weighting providing balanced exposure to large-cap growth stocks. Key risks include technology sector volatility and market concentration concerns. Analyst sentiment leans positive for near-term performance, though investors should monitor broader market trends and sector rotations that could impact the NASDAQ-100 composition.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
MAGS is an ETF that provides concentrated exposure to the seven technology-focused mega-cap companies often referred to as the 'Magnificent Seven' (Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta, Microsoft, NVIDIA, and Tesla). The fund is designed to capture the performance of these market-leading stocks, which have been the primary drivers of market returns. It offers a simple way for investors to invest solely in this select group of high-growth technology companies.
Read more on MAGS →QQQE is an ETF that seeks to track the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index. Unlike traditional market-capitalization-weighted indexes, this fund assigns equal weight to each of the 100 non-financial companies in the NASDAQ-100 and rebalances quarterly. This equal-weighting scheme reduces concentration risk in the largest technology companies and increases the fund's exposure to smaller-cap and mid-cap companies within the index, providing a differentiated growth profile.
Read more on QQQE →