Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF vs Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF — how do they compare? Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF trades at $73.42 (market cap $5.84B), while Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF trades at $28.29 (market cap $347.46M). The key difference: Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF is far larger — about 16.8× Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's market cap, and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF is trading nearer its 52-week high, Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF for 36 Days and Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF for 46 Days on average.
| MAGS | PBW | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $5.84B | $347.46M |
Volume | 1,765,091 | 413,698 |
Sector | Sector/Thematic | Sector/Thematic |
52-Week High | $73.90 | $46.99 |
52-Week Low | $55.39 | $28.29 |
Typical Hold Time | 36 Days | 46 Days |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF) trades at $73.69, down 0.28% on the day, with a bullish technical signal from moving averages but neutral oscillators. The ETF provides equal-weighted exposure to seven mega-cap tech leaders and has delivered 181% returns since launch, though it trails the S&P 500 in 2026 with just 2% YTD gains. Recent news highlights AI-driven momentum but also concerns about the 'Magnificent Seven' theme fracturing as capital spending pressures dividends and buybacks.
The outlook remains cautiously optimistic given AI supercycle potential, but investors face concentration risk in tech and underperformance versus broader markets. Key risks include aggressive AI spending impacting cash flows and shifting investor preference toward semiconductors. Analyst sentiment is mixed, balancing long-term growth prospects against near-term valuation concerns and market rotation trends.
PBW, the Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF, trades at $28.92, down 2.89% today amid a bearish technical signal from moving averages. The ETF's unique selection criteria prioritize ecological factors over financial metrics, resulting in concentrated exposure to the clean energy sector. Recent institutional selling, including a 96.3% reduction by IFP Advisors Inc. in Q2 2026 (SEC filing, September 18, 2026), reflects cautious sentiment despite long-term growth drivers like energy security and data center demand.
Outlook remains challenged by near-term volatility and sector underperformance versus broad markets, though global investment in clean energy offers structural tailwinds. Key risks include oil price swings, Fed policy impacts, and lack of diversification. Investors face a trade-off between speculative growth potential and elevated sensitivity to macroeconomic shifts.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
MAGS is an ETF that provides concentrated exposure to the seven technology-focused mega-cap companies often referred to as the 'Magnificent Seven' (Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta, Microsoft, NVIDIA, and Tesla). The fund is designed to capture the performance of these market-leading stocks, which have been the primary drivers of market returns. It offers a simple way for investors to invest solely in this select group of high-growth technology companies.
Read more on MAGS →PBW is an equal-weighted ETF that invests in U.S. companies leading the clean energy transition. It focuses on renewable energy, power conservation, and sustainable technologies like solar, wind, and energy storage.
Read more on PBW →