Compare Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) vs Monster Beverage Corp (MNST) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF vs Monster Beverage Corp — how do they compare? Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF trades at $73.43 (market cap $5.78B), while Monster Beverage Corp trades at $43.71 (market cap $85.51B). The key difference: Monster Beverage Corp is far larger — about 14.8× Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF's market cap, and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF is trading nearer its 52-week high, Monster Beverage Corp nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF for 36 Days and Monster Beverage Corp for 72 Days on average.
| MAGS | MNST | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $5.78B | $85.51B |
Volume | 4,410,665 | 8,569,709 |
Sector | Sector/Thematic | Consumer Staples |
52-Week High | $73.90 | $49.97 |
52-Week Low | $55.39 | $33.16 |
Typical Hold Time | 36 Days | 72 Days |
Enterprise Value | — | $83.81B |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF) trades at $73.69, down 0.28% with a bullish technical signal from moving averages. The ETF provides equal-weighted exposure to seven mega-cap tech leaders, though it has underperformed the S&P 500 in 2026 with only 2% YTD gains. Recent news highlights AI-driven momentum from holdings like Meta and NVIDIA, but also notes the Magnificent Seven theme showing signs of fracturing as capital spending pressures dividends and buybacks.
The outlook remains cautiously optimistic given AI supercycle potential, but concentration risk and valuation concerns persist. Key opportunities include pure-play exposure to AI growth engines, while risks involve market rotation away from mega-caps and aggressive capital expenditure cycles impacting shareholder returns. Technical support sits at $73 with resistance at $74-75.
Monster Beverage (MNST) trades at $42.88, down 0.86% on the day, with technical indicators showing bearish momentum despite strong fundamental performance. The company reported robust Q2 2026 earnings, beating estimates with $0.30 EPS, and maintains impressive profitability metrics including 55.55% gross margin and 23.08% net income margin. Recent news highlights Monster's debt-free balance sheet and international expansion driving 35% overseas sales growth.
While valuation multiples appear elevated (P/E 39.7, P/S 9.18), Monster's consistent earnings beats and analyst consensus price target of $98.22 suggest significant upside potential. Key risks include regulatory challenges in international markets and competitive pressures, but the company's strong cash flow generation and market position support long-term growth prospects.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
About Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
MAGS is an ETF that provides concentrated exposure to the seven technology-focused mega-cap companies often referred to as the 'Magnificent Seven' (Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta, Microsoft, NVIDIA, and Tesla). The fund is designed to capture the performance of these market-leading stocks, which have been the primary drivers of market returns. It offers a simple way for investors to invest solely in this select group of high-growth technology companies.
Read more on MAGS →About Monster Beverage Corp
Monster Beverage is a leader in the energy drink subsegment of the beverage industry. The Monster trademark anchors the portfolio, and notable offerings include Monster Energy and Monster Ultra. The firm has also started to incubate new trademarks for emerging enclaves of the energy space, like Reign in performance energy. It is primarily a brand owner, outsourcing most of its manufacturing processes to third-party copackers. It primarily uses the Coca-Cola bottling system for distribution after a strategic agreement in which Coke became Monster's largest shareholder (nearly 20%) and that also included the exchange of certain businesses between the two firms. Most of Monster's revenue is generated in the United States, though international geographies are increasing in the mix.
Read more on MNST →
