Lamb Weston Holdings Inc vs Monster Beverage Corp — how do they compare? Lamb Weston Holdings Inc trades at $52.79 (market cap $7.23B), while Monster Beverage Corp trades at $45.62 (market cap $89.20B). The key difference: Monster Beverage Corp is far larger — about 12.3× Lamb Weston Holdings Inc's market cap, and Lamb Weston Holdings Inc pays a 2.89% dividend while Monster Beverage Corp pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| LW | MNST | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $7.23B | $89.20B |
Sector | Consumer Staples | Consumer Staples |
52-Week High | $66.57 | $49.97 |
52-Week Low | $38.48 | $30.86 |
Enterprise Value | $11.10B | $87.49B |
Dividend Yield | 2.89% | — |
Trailing returns across standard periods
Latest headlines on both assets
Lamb Weston is the world's second-largest producer of branded and private-label frozen potato products, such as French fries, sweet potato fries, tater tots, diced potatoes, mashed potatoes, hash browns, and chips. The company also has a small appetizer business that produces onion rings, mozzarella sticks, and cheese curds. Including joint ventures, 63% of fiscal 2022 revenue was U.S.-based, with the remainder stemming from Europe, Canada, Japan, China, Korea, Mexico, and several other countries. Lamb Weston's customer mix is estimated 58% quick-serve restaurants, 19% full-service restaurants, 8% other food services (hotels, commercial cafeterias, arenas, schools), and 16% retail. Lamb Weston became an independent company in 2016 when it was spun off from Conagra.
Read more on LW →Monster Beverage is a leader in the energy drink subsegment of the beverage industry. The Monster trademark anchors the portfolio, and notable offerings include Monster Energy and Monster Ultra. The firm has also started to incubate new trademarks for emerging enclaves of the energy space, like Reign in performance energy. It is primarily a brand owner, outsourcing most of its manufacturing processes to third-party copackers. It primarily uses the Coca-Cola bottling system for distribution after a strategic agreement in which Coke became Monster's largest shareholder (nearly 20%) and that also included the exchange of certain businesses between the two firms. Most of Monster's revenue is generated in the United States, though international geographies are increasing in the mix.
Read more on MNST →