Las Vegas Sands Corp. vs ProShares Ultra QQQ ETF — how do they compare? Las Vegas Sands Corp. trades at $45.65 (market cap $29.44B), while ProShares Ultra QQQ ETF trades at $92.37. The key difference: Las Vegas Sands Corp. pays a 2.64% dividend while ProShares Ultra QQQ ETF pays none, and ProShares Ultra QQQ ETF is trading nearer its 52-week high, Las Vegas Sands Corp. nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| LVS | QLD | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $29.44B | — |
Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Leveraged / Inverse |
52-Week High | $69.49 | $100.53 |
52-Week Low | $44.78 | $57.16 |
Enterprise Value | $41.33B | — |
Dividend Yield | 2.64% | — |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
LVS trades at $45.68, up 0.48% on the day, with a bearish technical signal from moving averages but neutral oscillators. Revenue grew to $13.02B in 2025, with net income of $1.63B and a 12.59% margin. Recent earnings show mixed results, beating in Q4 2025 and Q1 2026 but missing in Q2 2026. The company maintains strong profitability metrics, including a 48.52% gross margin and 134.29% ROE. Positive news includes ESG recognitions and community initiatives, supporting a stable operational outlook.
The stock presents a buy opportunity with a consensus price target of $60.75, implying 33% upside, backed by 59% analyst buy ratings. Risks include high debt levels, with a debt-to-asset ratio of 73.15% in 2025, and sensitivity to macroeconomic factors affecting the gaming and tourism sectors. Institutional sentiment remains positive, but investors should monitor debt management and regional economic conditions for sustained growth.
QLD, the ProShares Ultra QQQ ETF, trades at $92.56, up 1.01% today, with a bullish technical signal from moving averages but neutral oscillators. The ETF, offering 2x daily leverage on the Nasdaq-100, has delivered over 10,000% total return since inception, though it carries amplified risk. Recent institutional buying includes 180 Wealth Advisors increasing its position by 29.4% in Q2 2026, signaling confidence in tech exposure.
The outlook for QLD hinges on tech sector performance, with AI optimism and easing geopolitical tensions as tailwinds. However, leveraged ETF structure risks decay in volatile markets, and a 63.80% historical drawdown underscores volatility. Investors seeking aggressive tech growth may find opportunity, but must tolerate significant swings; diversification and risk management are critical.
Trailing returns across standard periods
Las Vegas Sands is the world's largest operator of fully integrated resorts, featuring casino, hotel, entertainment, food and beverage, retail, and convention center operations. The company owns the Venetian Macao, Sands Macao, Londoner, Four Seasons Hotel Macao, and Parisian in Macao, and the Marina Bay Sands resort in Singapore. Its Venetian and Palazzo Las Vegas in the U.S. asets were sold to Apollo and VICI for $6.25 billion in 2022. We expect Sands to open a fourth tower in Singapore in 2026. After the sale of its Vegas assets, the company will generate all its EBITDA from Asia, with its casino operations generating the majority of sales.
Read more on LVS →QLD is a leveraged ETF that seeks daily investment results corresponding to 200% of the daily performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It achieves 2x leverage by investing in financial instruments such as swaps and is designed as a tactical trading tool for investors with a bullish (long) view on the NASDAQ-100. Due to the effects of compounding and leverage, the ETF is intended to be held for a single day and is not suitable for long-term investment.
Read more on QLD →