Lululemon Athletica Inc vs ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ ETF — how do they compare? Lululemon Athletica Inc trades at $94.41 (market cap $10.27B), while ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ ETF trades at $32.94 (market cap $2.23B). The key difference: Lululemon Athletica Inc is far larger — about 4.6× ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ ETF's market cap, and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ ETF is more actively traded (60,436,012 versus 4,392,324). Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Lululemon Athletica Inc for 105 Days and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ ETF for 12 Days on average.
| LULU | SQQQ | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $10.27B | $2.23B |
Volume | 4,392,324 | 60,436,012 |
Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Leveraged / Inverse |
52-Week High | $215.88 | $89.43 |
52-Week Low | $91.88 | $31.83 |
Typical Hold Time | 105 Days | 12 Days |
Enterprise Value | $11.02B | — |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Lululemon stock trades at $94.21, down 54% year-to-date and near its 52-week low. Despite strong profitability with a 56.11% gross margin and 30.9% ROE, recent revenue declines and a bearish technical signal have pressured shares. Multiple law firms are investigating potential securities fraud following the stock's sharp drop, while earnings have consistently beaten expectations.
The outlook remains challenged by growth concerns and governance scrutiny, though a low P/E of 7.63 offers valuation support. Risks include competitive pressures and ongoing legal probes, but analyst consensus targets $97.67, suggesting moderate upside if execution improves.
SQQQ, the ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ ETF, is currently trading at $33.02, up 2.93% on the day. The technical picture remains bearish with moving averages signaling continued downward pressure, though oscillators show neutral momentum. As a 3x leveraged inverse ETF designed to profit from Nasdaq 100 declines, SQQQ's performance is directly tied to technology sector weakness. Recent news highlights its potential role as a hedging tool against QQQ holdings during market downturns.
The outlook for SQQQ depends heavily on technology sector performance, with potential gains during Nasdaq 100 declines but significant decay risk during sustained rallies. Investors face substantial volatility risks due to daily rebalancing and compounding effects. Current market conditions suggest continued uncertainty for tech stocks, potentially supporting SQQQ's short-term appeal as a tactical hedge.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Latest headlines on both assets
Lululemon Athletica Inc. designs, distributes, and markets athletic apparel, footwear, and accessories for women, men, and girls. Lululemon offers pants, shorts, tops, and jackets for both leisure and athletic activities such as yoga and running. The company also sells fitness accessories, such as bags, yoga mats, and equipment. Lululemon sells its products through more than 600 company-owned stores in 18 countries, e-commerce, outlets, and wholesale accounts. The company was founded in 1998 and is based in Vancouver, Canada.
Read more on LULU →SQQQ is a leveraged inverse ETF that seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to three times the inverse (-3x) of the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index. It is a tactical trading tool designed for sophisticated investors to profit from or hedge against declines in large-cap technology and growth stocks. Due to its daily reset and the effects of compounding, it is intended for short-term use and carries significant risk if held during periods of high market volatility.
Read more on SQQQ →