Compare Lululemon Athletica Inc (LULU) vs Boston Beer Company Inc (SAM) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Lululemon Athletica Inc vs Boston Beer Company Inc — how do they compare? Lululemon Athletica Inc trades at $94.4 (market cap $10.27B), while Boston Beer Company Inc trades at $169.87 (market cap $1.76B). The key difference: Lululemon Athletica Inc is far larger — about 5.8× Boston Beer Company Inc's market cap, and Boston Beer Company Inc is more actively traded (264,496 versus 4,392,324). Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Lululemon Athletica Inc for 105 Days and Boston Beer Company Inc for 59 Days on average.
| LULU | SAM | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $10.27B | $1.76B |
Volume | 4,392,324 | 264,496 |
Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Consumer Staples |
52-Week High | $215.88 | $260.05 |
52-Week Low | $91.88 | $161.08 |
Typical Hold Time | 105 Days | 59 Days |
Enterprise Value | $11.02B | $1.53B |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Lululemon stock trades at $94.5, down 54% year-to-date and near its 52-week low, reflecting a bearish technical trend. Despite strong profitability with a 12.78% net income margin and a low P/E of 7.63, the stock faces headwinds from recent revenue declines and multiple securities fraud investigations. Earnings have beaten estimates in recent quarters, but negative sentiment and governance concerns weigh on investor confidence.
The outlook remains cautious; the stock's deep discount to historical valuations presents a potential opportunity, but risks from legal probes, competitive pressures, and weak growth visibility suggest limited near-term upside. Analyst consensus is mixed with a $97.67 price target, indicating modest potential from current levels amid high uncertainty.
Boston Beer Company (SAM) trades at $170.51, up 1.4% with a bullish technical signal despite recent earnings misses. The stock shows mixed fundamentals with a P/E of 22.66 and negative net margin of -3.64%, though operating cash flow remains strong at $270M. Recent news highlights brand innovation including new cocktail products and marketing partnerships, while analyst consensus leans heavily toward Hold (71.87%) with a $204.44 price target.
SAM faces headwinds from declining alcohol consumption and cost pressures, but brand investments and new product launches offer growth potential. The stock trades near support at $169 with upside to analyst targets, though execution risks and margin pressure require monitoring. Current valuation appears reasonable relative to historical levels.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About Lululemon Athletica Inc
Lululemon Athletica Inc. designs, distributes, and markets athletic apparel, footwear, and accessories for women, men, and girls. Lululemon offers pants, shorts, tops, and jackets for both leisure and athletic activities such as yoga and running. The company also sells fitness accessories, such as bags, yoga mats, and equipment. Lululemon sells its products through more than 600 company-owned stores in 18 countries, e-commerce, outlets, and wholesale accounts. The company was founded in 1998 and is based in Vancouver, Canada.
Read more on LULU →About Boston Beer Company Inc
Boston Beer is a leader in U.S. high-end malt beverages and adjacent categories, with strong positions in craft beer, hard cider, and hard seltzer. The firm sells an array of flavor variants and package sizes, predominantly centered around four priority brands: Samuel Adams, Angry Orchard, Twisted Tea, and Truly Hard Seltzer. Its drinks are produced in both company-owned breweries as well as through third-party contract arrangements, and while the company primarily goes to market through independent wholesalers (as mandated by law), it operates a fairly large salesforce to induce demand across the value chain (distributors, retailers, and drinkers). The preponderance of revenue is generated domestically.
Read more on SAM →
