Compare Lululemon Athletica Inc (LULU) vs Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Lululemon Athletica Inc vs Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF — how do they compare? Lululemon Athletica Inc trades at $116.62 (market cap $13.25B), while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF trades at $291.51. The key difference: Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF is trading nearer its 52-week high, Lululemon Athletica Inc nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| LULU | QQQM | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $13.25B | — |
Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Broad Market / Factor |
52-Week High | $224.03 | $307.23 |
52-Week Low | $105.43 | $228.02 |
Enterprise Value | $13.87B | — |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Lululemon trades at $116.63, up 0.26% today, amid bearish technical signals but strong fundamentals. The stock shows consistent earnings beats, with Q1 2026 EPS of $1.69 exceeding the $1.67 estimate. Revenue grew to $10.59B in 2025, with a net income margin of 17.13%. Recent news includes a $30M investment in nylon recycling startup Syntetica and resolution of a proxy battle with founder Chip Wilson, boosting shareholder confidence.
The outlook is mixed: valuation metrics like a P/E of 9.45 and EV/EBITDA of 5.41 suggest potential upside to the $129.29 consensus target, but technical bearishness and competitive pressures pose risks. Investors may find value in robust profitability and strategic initiatives, though macroeconomic headwinds and brand controversies require monitoring.
QQQM trades at $286.58 with minimal daily movement (+0.09%) amid bearish technical signals. The ETF faces headwinds from stretched tech valuations and rising AI competition, though recent Nasdaq-100 additions like SpaceX provide diversification. Technical indicators show oversold conditions with RSI at 22.39, while moving averages signal continued downward pressure.
The outlook remains cautious due to valuation concerns and sector rotation risks. However, the lower 0.15% expense ratio versus QQQ offers cost efficiency for long-term growth exposure. Key risks include AI market saturation and tech sector volatility, balanced by the fund's concentrated exposure to leading U.S. innovation companies.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About Lululemon Athletica Inc
Lululemon Athletica Inc. designs, distributes, and markets athletic apparel, footwear, and accessories for women, men, and girls. Lululemon offers pants, shorts, tops, and jackets for both leisure and athletic activities such as yoga and running. The company also sells fitness accessories, such as bags, yoga mats, and equipment. Lululemon sells its products through more than 600 company-owned stores in 18 countries, e-commerce, outlets, and wholesale accounts. The company was founded in 1998 and is based in Vancouver, Canada.
Read more on LULU →About Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
QQQM is an ETF designed to track the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It provides exposure to the 100 largest non-financial companies listed on the NASDAQ. Positioned as a lower-cost and more long-term-investor-friendly alternative to its peer QQQ, QQQM offers the same fundamental market exposure but typically has a lower share price and is structured to appeal to investors focused on accumulation rather than active trading.
Read more on QQQM →
