Compare Lululemon Athletica Inc (LULU) vs Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Lululemon Athletica Inc vs Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF — how do they compare? Lululemon Athletica Inc trades at $94.5 (market cap $10.27B), while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF trades at $309.39 (market cap $113.40B). The key difference: Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF is far larger — about 11× Lululemon Athletica Inc's market cap, and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF is trading nearer its 52-week high, Lululemon Athletica Inc nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Lululemon Athletica Inc for 105 Days and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF for 54 Days on average.
| LULU | QQQM | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $10.27B | $113.40B |
Volume | 4,392,324 | 2,866,236 |
Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Broad Market / Factor |
52-Week High | $215.88 | $312.76 |
52-Week Low | $91.88 | $229.87 |
Typical Hold Time | 105 Days | 54 Days |
Enterprise Value | $11.02B | — |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Lululemon stock trades at $94.5, down 54% year-to-date and near its 52-week low, reflecting a bearish technical trend. Despite strong profitability with a 12.78% net income margin and a low P/E of 7.63, the stock faces headwinds from recent revenue declines and multiple securities fraud investigations. Earnings have beaten estimates in recent quarters, but negative sentiment and governance concerns weigh on investor confidence.
The outlook remains cautious; the stock's deep discount to historical valuations presents a potential opportunity, but risks from legal probes, competitive pressures, and weak growth visibility suggest limited near-term upside. Analyst consensus is mixed with a $97.67 price target, indicating modest potential from current levels amid high uncertainty.
QQQM trades at $309.39, down 0.84% on the day, with a bullish technical signal from moving averages while oscillators remain neutral. The ETF's lower 0.15% expense ratio compared to QQQ's 0.18% provides a cost advantage, though trading spreads can impact returns. Recent institutional buying includes QRG Capital Management increasing its position by 207.5% during Q2 2026 (SEC filing, September 28, 2026).
The outlook remains positive given the Nasdaq-100's exposure to technology growth stocks, though concentration risk in top holdings and potential tax complications with covered-call alternatives like QQQI warrant caution. Market leadership from small-cap stocks within the index suggests continued momentum, but investors should monitor valuation levels given the current price near resistance at $311.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About Lululemon Athletica Inc
Lululemon Athletica Inc. designs, distributes, and markets athletic apparel, footwear, and accessories for women, men, and girls. Lululemon offers pants, shorts, tops, and jackets for both leisure and athletic activities such as yoga and running. The company also sells fitness accessories, such as bags, yoga mats, and equipment. Lululemon sells its products through more than 600 company-owned stores in 18 countries, e-commerce, outlets, and wholesale accounts. The company was founded in 1998 and is based in Vancouver, Canada.
Read more on LULU →About Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
QQQM is an ETF designed to track the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It provides exposure to the 100 largest non-financial companies listed on the NASDAQ. Positioned as a lower-cost and more long-term-investor-friendly alternative to its peer QQQ, QQQM offers the same fundamental market exposure but typically has a lower share price and is structured to appeal to investors focused on accumulation rather than active trading.
Read more on QQQM →
