Compare Logitech International SA (LOGI) vs New York Times Co (NYT) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Logitech International SA vs New York Times Co — how do they compare? Logitech International SA trades at $98.15 (market cap $14.46B), while New York Times Co trades at $66.32 (market cap $10.74B). The key difference: Logitech International SA is the larger of the two by market cap, and Logitech International SA pays the higher dividend (1.63%). Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Logitech International SA for 92 Days and New York Times Co for 81 Days on average.
| LOGI | NYT | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $14.46B | $10.74B |
Volume | 349,547 | 2,096,352 |
Sector | Technology | Media |
52-Week High | $126.69 | $85.86 |
52-Week Low | $85.84 | $54.66 |
Typical Hold Time | 92 Days | 81 Days |
Enterprise Value | $12.79B | $10.14B |
Dividend Yield | 1.63% | 1.38% |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Logitech (LOGI) trades at $98.49, down 3.61% on the day, with a neutral technical outlook and mixed analyst sentiment. The stock has consistently beaten earnings estimates in recent quarters, with Q3 2026 results pending. Strong profitability is evident with a net income margin of 16.28% and ROE of 35.29%. Recent news highlights product launches and partnerships, including new headsets and a collaboration with SEGA.
The outlook is balanced, with potential upside to the consensus price target of $107.00, supported by solid fundamentals and innovation. Risks include competitive pressures and macroeconomic sensitivity. Analyst consensus is divided, with 26.32% buy ratings, reflecting cautious optimism amid near-term volatility.
The New York Times Company (NYSE: NYT) trades at $65.64, up 1.14% today, with a bullish technical signal and strong fundamentals. Revenue grew from $2.3B in 2022 to $2.8B in 2025, with net income margin expanding to 12.17%. Recent earnings beats and a declared $0.23 dividend highlight operational strength, though a shareholder lawsuit presents headline risk.
Outlook is positive given consistent earnings outperformance and analyst consensus target of $84.00, implying 28% upside. Key risks include the pending lawsuit's impact on reputation and competitive pressures in digital media. Cash flow generation remains robust, supporting dividend sustainability and growth initiatives.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
About Logitech International SA
Logitech International SA is a Switzerland-based provider of personal computer and mobile accessories for navigation, video communication, and collaboration, smart home, and other applications. Its product portfolio includes mice, keyboards, charging stands, tablet cases, car mounts for mobile devices, remotes, home cameras, home switches, controllers, bluetooth speakers, surround sound, webcams, and conference cameras. It operates in a single segment namely, Peripherals. The firm generates revenue from the Americas, EMEA (Europe, Middle East, Africa), and the Asia Pacific region.
Read more on LOGI →About New York Times Co
New York Times Co is an American media company known for publishing its flagship newspaper, The New York Times. The company also operates the International New York Times newspaper, as well as digital properties such as nytimes and various smartphone applications. Circulation of The New York Times is the source of revenue for the company, followed by print and digital advertising and its paid digital-only subscription to The New York Times. The company has a daily print circulation of over 500,000 and 1,000,000 on Sundays. The source of growth for The New York Times is its digital subscription service, which has over 1,000,000 paid users.
Read more on NYT →
