Lockheed Martin Corporation vs Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF — how do they compare? Lockheed Martin Corporation trades at $509.59 (market cap $117.22B), while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF trades at $309.39 (market cap $113.40B). The key difference: Lockheed Martin Corporation and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF are close in size by market cap, and Lockheed Martin Corporation pays a 2.72% dividend while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Lockheed Martin Corporation for 86 Days and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF for 54 Days on average.
| LMT | QQQM | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $117.22B | $113.40B |
Volume | 1,101,121 | 2,866,236 |
Sector | Industrials | Broad Market / Factor |
52-Week High | $676.70 | $312.76 |
52-Week Low | $439.19 | $229.87 |
Typical Hold Time | 86 Days | 54 Days |
Enterprise Value | $133.96B | — |
Dividend Yield | 2.72% | — |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Lockheed Martin (LMT) trades at $507.89, up 1.74% with mixed technical signals showing bearish moving averages but neutral oscillators. The company reported Q2 2026 EPS beat but missed Q1 and Q4 2025 expectations, with revenue growth from $75.05B in 2025 to projected $77.0B in 2026. Recent news highlights AI integration and F-35 program developments, while analyst consensus remains strongly bullish with a $635.33 price target.
LMT offers stable defense sector exposure with 23 consecutive dividend increases and strong cash flow, but faces execution risks on fixed-price contracts and competitive pressures. The stock trades at reasonable valuations (P/E 18.73, P/S 1.53) with high institutional support, though technical weakness near support at $503 requires monitoring for sustained upward momentum.
QQQM trades at $307.85, down 1.33% on the day, with a bullish technical outlook supported by moving averages. The ETF benefits from Nasdaq-100 exposure and a competitive 0.15% expense ratio. Recent institutional buying includes QRG Capital Management increasing its position by 207.5% in Q2 2026. Technical indicators show support at $305 and resistance at $311.
The outlook remains positive given Nasdaq-100 strength and lower fees than QQQ. Risks include market concentration in technology stocks and potential tax implications of distributions. Analyst sentiment favors QQQM for core growth allocations, though some prefer equal-weight alternatives for diversification.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Latest headlines on both assets
Lockheed Martin is the largest defense contractor globally and has dominated the Western market for high-end fighter aircraft since the F-35 program was awarded in 2001. Lockheed's largest segment is aeronautics, which is dominated by the massive F-35 program. Lockheed's remaining segments are rotary and mission systems, which is mainly the Sikorsky helicopter business.
Read more on LMT →QQQM is an ETF designed to track the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It provides exposure to the 100 largest non-financial companies listed on the NASDAQ. Positioned as a lower-cost and more long-term-investor-friendly alternative to its peer QQQ, QQQM offers the same fundamental market exposure but typically has a lower share price and is structured to appeal to investors focused on accumulation rather than active trading.
Read more on QQQM →