Compare Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) vs New York Times Co (NYT) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Lockheed Martin Corporation vs New York Times Co — how do they compare? Lockheed Martin Corporation trades at $509.13 (market cap $117.22B), while New York Times Co trades at $66.32 (market cap $10.74B). The key difference: Lockheed Martin Corporation is far larger — about 10.9× New York Times Co's market cap, and Lockheed Martin Corporation pays the higher dividend (2.72%). Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Lockheed Martin Corporation for 86 Days and New York Times Co for 81 Days on average.
| LMT | NYT | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $117.22B | $10.74B |
Volume | 1,101,121 | 2,096,352 |
Sector | Industrials | Media |
52-Week High | $676.70 | $85.86 |
52-Week Low | $439.19 | $54.66 |
Typical Hold Time | 86 Days | 81 Days |
Enterprise Value | $133.96B | $10.14B |
Dividend Yield | 2.72% | 1.38% |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Lockheed Martin (LMT) trades at $508.18, up 1.79% with a bearish technical signal despite recent earnings beat. The defense contractor shows strong fundamentals with $75.05B revenue, 8.16% net margin, and robust cash flow of $8.56B from operations. Recent news highlights AI integration and F-35 program developments, while analyst consensus remains bullish with a $635.33 price target representing 25% upside potential.
LMT presents a compelling value opportunity with attractive valuation multiples (P/E 18.73, P/S 1.53) and 23-year dividend growth streak. Key risks include dependency on Pentagon contracts and fixed-price contract volatility. The stock's current discount to analyst targets and defensive positioning in aerospace/defense sector support long-term investment case despite near-term technical weakness.
The New York Times Company (NYSE: NYT) trades at $65.64, up 1.14% today, with a bullish technical signal and strong fundamentals. Revenue grew from $2.3B in 2022 to $2.8B in 2025, with net income margin expanding to 12.17%. Recent earnings beats and a declared $0.23 dividend highlight operational strength, though a shareholder lawsuit presents headline risk.
Outlook is positive given consistent earnings outperformance and analyst consensus target of $84.00, implying 28% upside. Key risks include the pending lawsuit's impact on reputation and competitive pressures in digital media. Cash flow generation remains robust, supporting dividend sustainability and growth initiatives.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About Lockheed Martin Corporation
Lockheed Martin is the largest defense contractor globally and has dominated the Western market for high-end fighter aircraft since the F-35 program was awarded in 2001. Lockheed's largest segment is aeronautics, which is dominated by the massive F-35 program. Lockheed's remaining segments are rotary and mission systems, which is mainly the Sikorsky helicopter business.
Read more on LMT →About New York Times Co
New York Times Co is an American media company known for publishing its flagship newspaper, The New York Times. The company also operates the International New York Times newspaper, as well as digital properties such as nytimes and various smartphone applications. Circulation of The New York Times is the source of revenue for the company, followed by print and digital advertising and its paid digital-only subscription to The New York Times. The company has a daily print circulation of over 500,000 and 1,000,000 on Sundays. The source of growth for The New York Times is its digital subscription service, which has over 1,000,000 paid users.
Read more on NYT →
