Compare Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) vs iShares iBoxx $ Inv Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Lockheed Martin Corporation vs iShares iBoxx $ Inv Grade Corporate Bond ETF — how do they compare? Lockheed Martin Corporation trades at $596 (market cap $137.96B), while iShares iBoxx $ Inv Grade Corporate Bond ETF trades at $106.32. The key difference: Lockheed Martin Corporation pays a 2.31% dividend while iShares iBoxx $ Inv Grade Corporate Bond ETF pays none, and Lockheed Martin Corporation is trading nearer its 52-week high, iShares iBoxx $ Inv Grade Corporate Bond ETF nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| LMT | LQD | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $137.96B | — |
Sector | Industrials | — |
52-Week High | $676.70 | $112.91 |
52-Week Low | $431.56 | $105.96 |
Enterprise Value | $154.71B | — |
Dividend Yield | 2.31% | — |
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About Lockheed Martin Corporation
Lockheed Martin is the largest defense contractor globally and has dominated the Western market for high-end fighter aircraft since the F-35 program was awarded in 2001. Lockheed's largest segment is aeronautics, which is dominated by the massive F-35 program. Lockheed's remaining segments are rotary and mission systems, which is mainly the Sikorsky helicopter business.
Read more on LMT →About iShares iBoxx $ Inv Grade Corporate Bond ETF
The fund will invest at least 80% of its assets in the component securities of the underlying index, and it will invest at least 90% of its assets in fixed income securities of the types included in the underlying index that the advisor believes will help the fund track the underlying index. The underlying index is designed to provide a broad representation of the US dollar-denominated liquid investment-grade corporate bond market.
Read more on LQD →
