Compare Levi Strauss & Co. (LEVI) vs Vanguard Real Estate Index Fund ETF (VNQ) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Levi Strauss & Co. vs Vanguard Real Estate Index Fund ETF — how do they compare? Levi Strauss & Co. trades at $18.7 (market cap $7.31B), while Vanguard Real Estate Index Fund ETF trades at $90.65 (market cap $70.80B). The key difference: Vanguard Real Estate Index Fund ETF is far larger — about 9.7× Levi Strauss & Co.'s market cap, and Levi Strauss & Co. pays a 3.36% dividend while Vanguard Real Estate Index Fund ETF pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Levi Strauss & Co. for 70 Days and Vanguard Real Estate Index Fund ETF for 113 Days on average.
| LEVI | VNQ | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $7.31B | $70.80B |
Volume | 13,683,095 | 6,073,580 |
Sector | Consumer Cyclical | — |
52-Week High | $25.53 | $100.95 |
52-Week Low | $17.92 | $87.00 |
Typical Hold Time | 70 Days | 113 Days |
Enterprise Value | $8.86B | — |
Dividend Yield | 3.36% | — |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Levi Strauss & Co. (LEVI) trades at $19.05, down 2.36% on the day, with a bearish technical signal but strong fundamental performance. The company has beaten earnings estimates for four consecutive quarters, including Q3 2026 EPS of $0.48 versus $0.36 expected. Financial health is robust with a net income margin of 8.83% and ROE of 25.76%. Recent news highlights a new CFO appointment and positive analyst expectations for Q3 results driven by denim demand trends.
The investment outlook is positive based on fundamentals and analyst sentiment, with a consensus price target of $29.00 implying significant upside. Risks include competitive pressures, recent cybersecurity incidents, and macroeconomic sensitivity. Wall Street maintains a strong buy consensus, supporting a favorable risk-reward profile for long-term investors.
VNQ trades at $89.35, up 0.74% today but facing bearish technical signals with 14 sell signals versus 5 buy signals. The ETF has declined nearly 10% over the past month amid rising Treasury yields and Federal Reserve rate hikes, eroding its income appeal relative to safer alternatives. Recent institutional buying by State Street Corp and Envestnet suggests some value hunting despite sector headwinds.
Outlook remains challenged by interest rate sensitivity, though contrarian investors see opportunity in discounted REIT valuations. Key risks include continued rate hikes and property oversupply, while potential catalysts include yield stabilization and sector rotation if economic conditions improve.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About Levi Strauss & Co.
Levi Strauss & Co is involved in designing, marketing, and selling products that include jeans, casual and dresses pants, tops, shorts, skirts, jackets, footwear, and related accessories directly or through third parties and licensees for men, women, and children under Levi's, Dockers, Signature by Levi Strauss & Co. and Denizen brands. The company manages its business according to three regional segments: the Americas, which is the key revenue driver
Read more on LEVI →About Vanguard Real Estate Index Fund ETF
The fund employs an indexing investment approach designed to track the performance of the MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index, an index made up of stocks of large, mid-size, and small US companies within the real estate sector. The Advisor attempts to replicate the target index by seeking to invest all of its assets in the stocks that make up the index, in order to hold each stock in approximately the same proportion as its weighting in the index. It is non-diversified.
Read more on VNQ →
