Kroger Co vs Invesco Solar ETF — how do they compare? Kroger Co trades at $61.64 (market cap $36.27B), while Invesco Solar ETF trades at $43.75 (market cap $894.08M). The key difference: Kroger Co is far larger — about 40.6× Invesco Solar ETF's market cap, and Kroger Co pays a 2.54% dividend while Invesco Solar ETF pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Kroger Co for 108 Days and Invesco Solar ETF for 34 Days on average.
| KR | TAN | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $36.27B | $894.08M |
Volume | 8,301,523 | 370,994 |
Sector | Consumer Staples | Sector/Thematic |
52-Week High | $75.60 | $73.95 |
52-Week Low | $55.53 | $43.00 |
Typical Hold Time | 108 Days | 34 Days |
Enterprise Value | $57.69B | — |
Dividend Yield | 2.54% | — |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Kroger (KR) trades at $61.41, up 3.65% with a bullish technical outlook. The stock shows strong fundamentals with $147.12B revenue and $2.67B net income for 2025, though net margin remains thin at 0.73%. Recent earnings beat expectations in Q2 2026, and the company maintains consistent dividends. Analysts are moderately bullish with a $70.62 consensus target, citing digital growth and operational improvements as key drivers.
KR offers value with low P/S (0.26) and stable cash flow generation, but faces risks from competitive pressures and integration challenges from acquisitions. The stock presents opportunity for investors seeking defensive exposure with dividend income, though margin compression and economic sensitivity warrant caution.
TAN (Invesco Solar ETF) trades at $43.75, up 0.51% with bearish technical signals from moving averages. The solar sector faces headwinds from high borrowing costs impacting project financing, as recent news highlights sector volatility. Technical indicators show 16 sell signals versus 1 buy, with key resistance at $44 and support at $43. The ETF's expense ratio of 0.7% is higher than broader energy alternatives, contributing to its underperformance versus the S&P 500 over five years.
Outlook remains cautious due to sector-specific risks including interest rate sensitivity and market saturation concerns. Investment opportunity exists for long-term renewable energy exposure, but risks include policy uncertainty, cost pressures, and competitive ETF alternatives with lower fees. The bearish technical setup suggests near-term pressure despite potential long-term energy transition tailwinds.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Kroger is the leading American grocer, with 2,726 supermarkets operating under several banners throughout the country as of the end of fiscal 2021. Around 83% of stores have pharmacies, while nearly 60% also sell fuel. The company also operates roughly 120 fine jewelry stores. Kroger features a leading private-label offering and manufactures around 30% of its own-brand units (and more than 40% of its grocery own-label assortment) itself, in 33 food production plants nationwide. Kroger is a top-two grocer in most of its major markets (as of early 2021, according to company data). Virtually all of Kroger's sales come from the United States.
Read more on KR →TAN is a thematic ETF that tracks the MAC Global Solar Energy Index. It provides targeted exposure to the global solar industry, including manufacturers of solar panels, installers, and component suppliers like Enphase and First Solar.
Read more on TAN →