Compare Kimberly Clark Corp (KMB) vs Viatris Inc (VTRS) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Kimberly Clark Corp vs Viatris Inc — how do they compare? Kimberly Clark Corp trades at $97.96 (market cap $32.51B), while Viatris Inc trades at $17.71 (market cap $20.03B). The key difference: Kimberly Clark Corp is the larger of the two by market cap, and Kimberly Clark Corp pays the higher dividend (5.24%). Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Kimberly Clark Corp for 93 Days and Viatris Inc for 57 Days on average.
| KMB | VTRS | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $32.51B | $20.03B |
Volume | 6,139,913 | 14,109,977 |
Sector | Consumer Staples | Health |
52-Week High | $121.44 | $18.27 |
52-Week Low | $93.05 | $9.74 |
Typical Hold Time | 93 Days | 57 Days |
Enterprise Value | $38.07B | $32.15B |
Dividend Yield | 5.24% | 2.75% |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Kimberly-Clark (KMB) trades at $98.02, up 1.6% on the day, showing modest recovery from recent weakness. The stock faces bearish technical signals with support at $96 and resistance at $98. Fundamentally, the company maintains strong profitability with 11.79% net margins and consistent dividend payments, though revenue declined to $16.45B in 2025. Recent executive transitions and the pending Kenvue acquisition create both uncertainty and strategic opportunity.
KMB offers a compelling dividend yield above 5% with 54 consecutive years of increases, but faces execution risks from the Kenvue integration. Analyst consensus targets $117.25 (19% upside) with mixed sentiment (32% buy, 58% hold). The stock presents value for income investors but requires careful monitoring of acquisition progress and cash flow sustainability.
Viatris (VTRS) trades at $17.625, up 0.77% with a bullish technical signal. The company shows mixed fundamentals with declining revenue from $16.3B in 2022 to $14.3B in 2025 and negative net income margins, though recent quarters have beaten EPS estimates. Positive cash flow trends and a $0.12 dividend signal financial stability. Analyst consensus is mixed with 38% buy ratings and a $22.17 price target suggesting 26% upside.
The outlook balances operational strength against profitability challenges. Investment appeal lies in value metrics (P/S 1.38), consistent earnings beats, and dividend yield, but risks include sustained negative margins, high debt, and competitive pressures. The stock's re-rating depends on margin improvement and pipeline execution.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About Kimberly Clark Corp
With around half of sales from personal care and another third from tissue products, Kimberly-Clark sits as a leading manufacturer of tissue and hygiene realm. Its brand mix includes Huggies, Pull-Ups, Kotex, Depend, Kleenex, and Cottonelle. The firm also operates K-C Professional, which partners with businesses to provide safety and sanitary products for the workplace. Kimberly-Clark generates just over of half its sales in North America and more than 10% in Europe, with the rest primarily concentrated in Asia and Latin America.
Read more on KMB →About Viatris Inc
Formed by the combination of Mylan and Pfizer's Upjohn business in 2020, Viatris is one of the world's largest generic drug manufacturers, with a substantial off-patent branded drug portfolio. Its portfolio consists of more than 1,400 molecules with penetration across most of the developed world and in select emerging markets. The company's branded drug portfolio consists of off-patent blockbuster drugs that continue to generate strong sales, including Lipitor, Norvasc, Lyrica, Viagra, and EpiPen. While global competition has facilitated the commodification of small-molecule generic drugs, the company has demonstrated an edge over peers in its ability to manufacture complex generics (for example, generic Advair and Copaxone).
Read more on VTRS →
