Kimberly Clark Corp vs Under Armour Inc Class A — how do they compare? Kimberly Clark Corp trades at $108.01 (market cap $36.01B), while Under Armour Inc Class A trades at $7.29 (market cap $3.07B). The key difference: Kimberly Clark Corp is far larger — about 11.7× Under Armour Inc Class A's market cap, and Kimberly Clark Corp pays a 4.72% dividend while Under Armour Inc Class A pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| KMB | UAA | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $36.01B | $3.07B |
Sector | Consumer Staples | Consumer Cyclical |
52-Week High | $136.77 | $8.14 |
52-Week Low | $93.05 | $4.17 |
Enterprise Value | $42.55B | $4.70B |
Dividend Yield | 4.72% | — |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Kimberly-Clark (KMB) trades at $108.43, up 0.07% on the day, with a neutral technical signal and bullish moving averages. The stock shows consistent earnings beats, with Q1 2026 EPS of $1.97 exceeding the $1.93 estimate. Revenue declined to $16.45B in 2025, but net income margin remains strong at 12.8%. Recent news highlights KMB's innovation strategy and its status as a Dividend King, with a 4.5% yield attracting income investors.
KMB offers stable income with a high dividend yield and solid fundamentals, but faces revenue pressure and competitive risks. Analyst consensus is a $115.33 price target with a hold-heavy rating. Key risks include consumer sentiment impacts and input cost inflation, while the pending Kenvue merger provides growth potential.
Under Armour (UAA) trades at $7.28, down 2.02% amid mixed signals. The stock shows technical bullish momentum with strong moving average support, but faces fundamental challenges including a net loss of $201.27 million in 2025 and negative profit margins. Recent earnings showed Q4 2025 beat expectations but Q1 2026 missed, while the company maintains international growth momentum despite North American weakness.
The outlook remains cautious with analyst consensus price target of $5.96 below current levels. Investment opportunity exists in international expansion and DTC growth, but risks include persistent North American weakness, margin pressure, and negative cash flow trends that could pressure shareholder value in the near term.
Trailing returns across standard periods
Latest headlines on both assets
With around half of sales from personal care and another third from tissue products, Kimberly-Clark sits as a leading manufacturer of tissue and hygiene realm. Its brand mix includes Huggies, Pull-Ups, Kotex, Depend, Kleenex, and Cottonelle. The firm also operates K-C Professional, which partners with businesses to provide safety and sanitary products for the workplace. Kimberly-Clark generates just over of half its sales in North America and more than 10% in Europe, with the rest primarily concentrated in Asia and Latin America.
Read more on KMB →Under Armour develops, markets, and distributes athletic apparel, footwear, and accessories in North America and other territories. Consumers of its apparel include professional and amateur athletes, sponsored college and professional teams, and people with active lifestyles. The company sells merchandise through direct-to-consumer, including e-commerce and more than 400 combined factory house and brand house stores, and wholesale channels. Under Armour also operates a digital fitness app called MapMyFitness. The Baltimore-based company was founded in 1996.
Read more on UAA →