Compare Kimberly Clark Corp (KMB) vs Thomson Reuters Corp (TRI) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Kimberly Clark Corp vs Thomson Reuters Corp — how do they compare? Kimberly Clark Corp trades at $97.59 (market cap $32.51B), while Thomson Reuters Corp trades at $103.21 (market cap $43.89B). The key difference: Thomson Reuters Corp is the larger of the two by market cap, and Kimberly Clark Corp pays the higher dividend (5.24%). Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Kimberly Clark Corp for 93 Days and Thomson Reuters Corp for 63 Days on average.
| KMB | TRI | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $32.51B | $43.89B |
Volume | 6,139,913 | 1,648,199 |
Sector | Consumer Staples | Industrials |
52-Week High | $121.44 | $163.45 |
52-Week Low | $93.05 | $76.55 |
Typical Hold Time | 93 Days | 63 Days |
Enterprise Value | $38.07B | $46.51B |
Dividend Yield | 5.24% | 2.58% |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Kimberly-Clark (KMB) trades at $97.74, up 1.31% on the day, with a bearish technical outlook and mixed fundamentals. Recent earnings show a Q2 2026 miss but beats in prior quarters, while revenue declined to $16.45B in 2025. The company maintains a strong dividend yield of over 5% with 54 consecutive years of increases, but cash flow trends raise sustainability questions amid its pending Kenvue acquisition.
KMB offers value with a P/E of 19.32 and analyst consensus target of $117.25, implying 20% upside, but risks include integration challenges from the Kenvue deal, litigation liabilities, and pressured cash flows. The stock's high ROE of 129.43% signals efficient capital use, yet investor sentiment is cautious due to near-term execution hurdles.
Thomson Reuters (TRI) trades at $101.55, up 2.29% on the day, with a bullish technical signal supported by moving averages. The company maintains strong profitability with 75.7% gross margins and 21.22% net income margins, though Q4 2025 earnings slightly missed expectations. Recent strategic moves include divesting its printing unit to focus on technology offerings and launching a proprietary AI model, positioning for future growth in legal tech and content services.
Outlook remains positive with analyst consensus price target of $133.25 (31% upside) and 52% buy ratings. Key risks include cybersecurity incidents and execution of AI strategy. Revenue growth is projected at 4% for 2026, supported by recurring revenue streams and organic growth in core businesses.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About Kimberly Clark Corp
With around half of sales from personal care and another third from tissue products, Kimberly-Clark sits as a leading manufacturer of tissue and hygiene realm. Its brand mix includes Huggies, Pull-Ups, Kotex, Depend, Kleenex, and Cottonelle. The firm also operates K-C Professional, which partners with businesses to provide safety and sanitary products for the workplace. Kimberly-Clark generates just over of half its sales in North America and more than 10% in Europe, with the rest primarily concentrated in Asia and Latin America.
Read more on KMB →About Thomson Reuters Corp
Thomson Reuters is the result of the $17.6 billion megamerger of Canada's Thomson and the United Kingdom's Reuters Group in 2008 and the 2018 carve-out of its finance and risk business, Refinitiv, in which it holds a 45% stake. In 2019, the company agreed to exchange its 45% stake in Refinitiv for a 15% stake in LSE, which closed in early 2021. Since the divestiture, the company is more concentrated on selling its flagship legal data and software, Westlaw, and its tax accounting software, Onesource. Reuters sees roughly 80% of revenue and 70% of expenses attributed to the United States, while the remainder (largely through the global print and Reuters News segments) is distributed across Latin America, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia-Pacific.
Read more on TRI →
