Kimberly Clark Corp vs Thomson Reuters Corp — how do they compare? Kimberly Clark Corp trades at $108.57 (market cap $36.11B), while Thomson Reuters Corp trades at $104.52 (market cap $45.38B). The key difference: Thomson Reuters Corp is the larger of the two by market cap, and Kimberly Clark Corp pays the higher dividend (4.72%). Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| KMB | TRI | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $36.11B | $45.38B |
Sector | Consumer Staples | Industrials |
52-Week High | $134.81 | $178.77 |
52-Week Low | $93.05 | $76.55 |
Enterprise Value | $41.67B | $48.00B |
Dividend Yield | 4.72% | 2.5% |
Trailing returns across standard periods
With around half of sales from personal care and another third from tissue products, Kimberly-Clark sits as a leading manufacturer of tissue and hygiene realm. Its brand mix includes Huggies, Pull-Ups, Kotex, Depend, Kleenex, and Cottonelle. The firm also operates K-C Professional, which partners with businesses to provide safety and sanitary products for the workplace. Kimberly-Clark generates just over of half its sales in North America and more than 10% in Europe, with the rest primarily concentrated in Asia and Latin America.
Read more on KMB →Thomson Reuters is the result of the $17.6 billion megamerger of Canada's Thomson and the United Kingdom's Reuters Group in 2008 and the 2018 carve-out of its finance and risk business, Refinitiv, in which it holds a 45% stake. In 2019, the company agreed to exchange its 45% stake in Refinitiv for a 15% stake in LSE, which closed in early 2021. Since the divestiture, the company is more concentrated on selling its flagship legal data and software, Westlaw, and its tax accounting software, Onesource. Reuters sees roughly 80% of revenue and 70% of expenses attributed to the United States, while the remainder (largely through the global print and Reuters News segments) is distributed across Latin America, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia-Pacific.
Read more on TRI →