Compare Kimberly Clark Corp (KMB) vs Monster Beverage Corp (MNST) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Kimberly Clark Corp vs Monster Beverage Corp — how do they compare? Kimberly Clark Corp trades at $109.45 (market cap $36.11B), while Monster Beverage Corp trades at $45.5 (market cap $89.20B). The key difference: Monster Beverage Corp is far larger — about 2.5× Kimberly Clark Corp's market cap, and Kimberly Clark Corp pays a 4.72% dividend while Monster Beverage Corp pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| KMB | MNST | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $36.11B | $89.20B |
Sector | Consumer Staples | Consumer Staples |
52-Week High | $134.81 | $49.97 |
52-Week Low | $93.05 | $30.86 |
Enterprise Value | $41.67B | $87.49B |
Dividend Yield | 4.72% | — |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Kimberly-Clark (KMB) trades at $108.02, down 1.51% today, with a bearish technical signal and mixed fundamentals. Recent Q2 2026 earnings missed expectations, prompting a lowered 2026 outlook due to China diaper market weakness and North American volatility. The company maintains strong profitability with a net income margin of 11.79% and a high ROE of 129.43%, but faces revenue pressure with 2025 sales at $16.45B, down from prior years. Dividend payments remain steady at $1.28 per share, supporting income investors.
KMB presents a cautious outlook with near-term headwinds overshadowing long-term strengths. Investment opportunities include a discounted valuation relative to historical levels and a reliable dividend yield. Key risks involve execution challenges in China, competitive pressures, and macroeconomic sensitivity. Analyst consensus is mixed, with a $113.20 price target suggesting modest upside, but investors should weigh operational uncertainties against the company's brand resilience and cost-saving initiatives.
Monster Beverage (MNST) trades at $45.53, down 0.35% on the day, with a bearish technical signal despite recent earnings beats. The company shows strong fundamentals with 2025 revenue of $8.29B and net income of $1.91B, maintaining robust profit margins above 23%. Recent Q2 2026 results exceeded expectations with $0.60 EPS versus $0.59 expected, driven by international growth. The stock completed a 2-for-1 split on August 11, 2026.
MNST presents a mixed outlook with strong earnings momentum and international expansion offset by premium valuation concerns. The stock trades at 42.16x P/E, above sector averages, while analyst consensus targets $51.14 suggest 12% upside. Key risks include competitive pressures in energy drinks and valuation sensitivity to growth sustainability.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About Kimberly Clark Corp
With around half of sales from personal care and another third from tissue products, Kimberly-Clark sits as a leading manufacturer of tissue and hygiene realm. Its brand mix includes Huggies, Pull-Ups, Kotex, Depend, Kleenex, and Cottonelle. The firm also operates K-C Professional, which partners with businesses to provide safety and sanitary products for the workplace. Kimberly-Clark generates just over of half its sales in North America and more than 10% in Europe, with the rest primarily concentrated in Asia and Latin America.
Read more on KMB →About Monster Beverage Corp
Monster Beverage is a leader in the energy drink subsegment of the beverage industry. The Monster trademark anchors the portfolio, and notable offerings include Monster Energy and Monster Ultra. The firm has also started to incubate new trademarks for emerging enclaves of the energy space, like Reign in performance energy. It is primarily a brand owner, outsourcing most of its manufacturing processes to third-party copackers. It primarily uses the Coca-Cola bottling system for distribution after a strategic agreement in which Coke became Monster's largest shareholder (nearly 20%) and that also included the exchange of certain businesses between the two firms. Most of Monster's revenue is generated in the United States, though international geographies are increasing in the mix.
Read more on MNST →
