Compare Kimberly Clark Corp (KMB) vs Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Kimberly Clark Corp vs Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF — how do they compare? Kimberly Clark Corp trades at $108.46 (market cap $36.11B), while Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF trades at $67.68. The key difference: Kimberly Clark Corp pays a 4.72% dividend while Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF pays none, and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF is trading nearer its 52-week high, Kimberly Clark Corp nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| KMB | MAGS | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $36.11B | — |
Sector | Consumer Staples | Sector/Thematic |
52-Week High | $134.81 | $70.94 |
52-Week Low | $93.05 | $55.39 |
Enterprise Value | $41.67B | — |
Dividend Yield | 4.72% | — |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Kimberly-Clark (KMB) trades at $108.95, up 0.86% on the day, with a neutral technical signal. The stock shows strong profitability with a net income margin of 11.79% and a high ROE of 129.43%, though revenue declined to $16.45B in 2025. Recent Q2 2026 earnings missed expectations, and the company cut its 2026 outlook due to challenges in China and softer consumer demand, as reported by Reuters on August 4, 2026.
The outlook is mixed; KMB offers a solid dividend yield and trades below the consensus price target of $113.20, but near-term headwinds from China and volatile shipments pose risks. Analyst sentiment is cautious with 61.29% hold ratings, reflecting balanced optimism for long-term value against short-term operational pressures.
MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF) trades at $67.71, down 1.93% amid broader rotation away from concentrated tech exposure. Technical indicators show bullish moving averages but overbought RSI levels, with key support at $67. Recent news highlights the ETF's 181% gain since launch but notes underperformance versus the S&P 500 this year as AI spending pressures tech balance sheets.
The ETF faces headwinds from compressed hyperscaler valuations and declining payout ratios, though AI revenue growth potential remains. Risks include concentration in seven mega-caps and market broadening away from tech leadership. Analyst sentiment is mixed, balancing long-term AI themes against near-term valuation concerns.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About Kimberly Clark Corp
With around half of sales from personal care and another third from tissue products, Kimberly-Clark sits as a leading manufacturer of tissue and hygiene realm. Its brand mix includes Huggies, Pull-Ups, Kotex, Depend, Kleenex, and Cottonelle. The firm also operates K-C Professional, which partners with businesses to provide safety and sanitary products for the workplace. Kimberly-Clark generates just over of half its sales in North America and more than 10% in Europe, with the rest primarily concentrated in Asia and Latin America.
Read more on KMB →About Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
MAGS is an ETF that provides concentrated exposure to the seven technology-focused mega-cap companies often referred to as the 'Magnificent Seven' (Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta, Microsoft, NVIDIA, and Tesla). The fund is designed to capture the performance of these market-leading stocks, which have been the primary drivers of market returns. It offers a simple way for investors to invest solely in this select group of high-growth technology companies.
Read more on MAGS →
