KKR & Co Inc vs Northrop Grumman Corporation — how do they compare? KKR & Co Inc trades at $90.95 (market cap $80.39B), while Northrop Grumman Corporation trades at $480.72 (market cap $68.83B). The key difference: KKR & Co Inc is the larger of the two by market cap, and Northrop Grumman Corporation pays the higher dividend (2.04%). Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold KKR & Co Inc for 67 Days and Northrop Grumman Corporation for 81 Days on average.
| KKR | NOC | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $80.39B | $68.83B |
Volume | 6,517,705 | 1,081,989 |
Sector | Financials | Industrials |
52-Week High | $142.75 | $768.02 |
52-Week Low | $83.88 | $473.46 |
Typical Hold Time | 67 Days | 81 Days |
Enterprise Value | $2.95B | $82.81B |
Dividend Yield | 0.87% | 2.04% |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
KKR trades at $89.56, down 0.12% with bearish technical signals despite strong analyst support. The company reported mixed quarterly results with Q2 2026 EPS beating expectations at $1.63 versus $1.43 estimate, while Q4 2025 missed. Recent business activity includes joint ventures with Thomson Reuters and Realty Income, plus multiple asset sales in Asia. Financial trends show revenue stabilizing around $19-21B with net margins improving to 14.96% projected for 2026.
The investment case balances strong Wall Street bullishness (88.9% buy ratings, $123.30 consensus target) against technical weakness and volatile cash flows. Key opportunities include continued earnings beats and strategic partnerships, while risks involve significant debt levels and market-sensitive investment returns. The stock presents a value gap if fundamentals can overcome current technical pressure.
Northrop Grumman (NOC) trades at $484.48, up 2.33% today, but technical indicators signal a bearish trend with the stock below key moving averages. Fundamentally, the company shows strength with a P/E of 15.4, robust profitability margins, and consistent earnings beats in recent quarters. Recent news highlights a mixed environment, including a significant contract loss to Boeing but sustained demand from defense budgets and a record backlog supporting future revenue.
The outlook remains positive due to strong fundamentals and analyst consensus, with a price target of $600.62 implying substantial upside. Key risks include competitive pressures from recent contract losses and dependence on government spending, but the company's financial health and dividend payments provide stability for investors.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
Latest headlines on both assets
KKR is one of the world's largest alternative asset managers, with $490.7 billion in total assets under management, including $384.5 billion in fee-earning AUM, at the end of June 2022. The company has two core segments: asset management (which includes private markets--private equity, credit, infrastructure, energy and real estate--and public markets--primarily credit and hedge/investment fund platforms) and insurance (following the February 2021 purchase of a 61.5% economic stake in Global Atlantic Financial Group, which is engaged in retirement/annuity and life insurance lines as well as reinsurance). On the asset management side, private markets account for 50% of fee-earning AUM and 70% of base management fees, while public markets account for 50% and 30%, respectively.
Read more on KKR →Northrop Grumman is a defense contractor that is diversified across short-cycle and long-cycle businesses. The firm's segments include aeronautics, mission systems, defense services, and space systems. The company's aerospace segment creates the fuselage for the massive F-35 program and produces various piloted and autonomous flight systems. Mission systems creates a variety of sensors and processors for defense hardware. The defense systems segment is a long-range missile manufacturer. Finally, the company's space systems segment produces various space structures, sensors, and satellites.
Read more on NOC →