Compare iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) vs Marqeta Inc (MQ) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
iShares Global Tech ETF vs Marqeta Inc — how do they compare? iShares Global Tech ETF trades at $142.34, while Marqeta Inc trades at $15.58 (market cap $1.62B). The key difference: iShares Global Tech ETF is trading nearer its 52-week high, Marqeta Inc nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| IXN | MQ | |
|---|---|---|
Sector | Sector/Thematic | Technology |
52-Week High | $149.74 | $26.00 |
52-Week Low | $94.42 | $15.04 |
Market Cap | — | $1.62B |
Enterprise Value | — | $935.36M |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
No Aura AI signal available yet.
MQ trades at $15.59, down slightly by 0.06%. The stock exhibits a bearish technical signal with strong selling pressure on moving averages. Fundamentally, the company shows improving revenue trends, with 2026 revenue projected at $677 million and a return to positive net income. Recent partnerships with Google and Riskified highlight strategic growth initiatives in digital payments and fraud prevention.
MQ's outlook is cautiously optimistic, driven by revenue growth and profitability improvements, but high valuation ratios and past earnings volatility present risks. Analyst consensus is a 'Hold' with a $19 price target, suggesting moderate upside potential from current levels amid competitive and execution challenges.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
About iShares Global Tech ETF
IXN provides exposure to global electronics, software, and hardware companies. It tracks the S&P Global 1200 Information Technology Index, covering tech leaders across both developed and emerging markets.
Read more on IXN →About Marqeta Inc
Headquartered in Oakland, California, and founded in 2010, Marqeta provides its clients with a card-issuing platform that offers the infrastructure and tools necessary to offer digital, physical, and tokenized payment options without the need for a traditional bank. The company's open APIs are designed to allow third parties like DoorDash, Klarna, and Block to rapidly develop and deploy innovative card-based products and payment services without the need to develop the underlying technology. The company generates revenue primarily through processing and ATM fees for cards issued on its platform.
Read more on MQ →
