Compare iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) vs Under Armour Inc Class A (UA) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
iShares Russell 2000 ETF vs Under Armour Inc Class A — how do they compare? iShares Russell 2000 ETF trades at $278.26 (market cap $77.70B), while Under Armour Inc Class A trades at $4.74 (market cap $2.07B). The key difference: iShares Russell 2000 ETF is far larger — about 37.5× Under Armour Inc Class A's market cap, and iShares Russell 2000 ETF is trading nearer its 52-week high, Under Armour Inc Class A nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold iShares Russell 2000 ETF for 83 Days and Under Armour Inc Class A for 18 Days on average.
| IWM | UA | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $77.70B | $2.07B |
Volume | 35,598,983 | 2,680,141 |
52-Week High | $305.06 | $7.88 |
52-Week Low | $229.13 | $3.96 |
Typical Hold Time | 83 Days | 18 Days |
Sector | — | Consumer Cyclical |
Enterprise Value | — | $3.05B |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
IWM trades at $277.72, down 1.27% amid broader small-cap weakness. Technical indicators show a bearish trend with resistance at $278 and support at $275. The ETF faces headwinds from Federal Reserve rate hikes and underperformance relative to large-cap indices over the past decade. Recent news highlights concerns about small-cap risk premiums and competition from more selective small-cap funds.
The outlook remains cautious as rising interest rates pressure small-cap valuations. Opportunities exist for long-term investors seeking diversification from tech-heavy large caps, but near-term risks include economic sensitivity and narrow market breadth. The bearish technical setup suggests further downside potential unless macroeconomic conditions improve.
Under Armour (UA) trades at $4.70, down 0.42% with a mixed technical picture showing bullish overall signals but bearish moving averages. The company faces significant fundamental challenges with declining revenue ($5.16B in 2025 to $4.9B in 2026) and negative profitability metrics, including a -9.99% net income margin and -29.82% ROE. Recent earnings show volatility with two beats and one miss in the last four quarters, while cash flow remains negative across all categories.
The outlook remains challenging with declining revenue trends and persistent profitability issues offset by relatively low valuation multiples. Investment opportunity exists if management can stabilize sales and improve margins, but risks include continued consumer demand weakness and competitive pressures in the athletic apparel sector. Analyst sentiment is mixed with 41% buy ratings but growing concerns about the company's turnaround prospects.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
About iShares Russell 2000 ETF
The ETF is designed to track the performance of the securities and the stocks in the Russell 2000 Index. To maintain the composition and weightings, the advisor adjusts the ETF from time to time to conform to periodic changes in the index target.
Read more on IWM →About Under Armour Inc Class A
Under Armour is a leading inventor, marketer, and distributor of branded athletic performance apparel, footwear, and accessories. Built on the 'technical' performance of synthetic fabrics, the company is currently undergoing a multi-year brand evolution centered on premium product innovation, operational rigor, and a renewed focus on its North American core under the guidance of founder Kevin Plank.
Read more on UA →
