iShares Russell 2000 ETF vs Nomura Holdings Inc — how do they compare? iShares Russell 2000 ETF trades at $302.92, while Nomura Holdings Inc trades at $9.8 (market cap $28.46B). The key difference: Nomura Holdings Inc pays a 3.31% dividend while iShares Russell 2000 ETF pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| IWM | NMR | |
|---|---|---|
52-Week High | $301.69 | $10.04 |
52-Week Low | $225.45 | $6.73 |
Market Cap | — | $28.46B |
Sector | — | Financials |
Dividend Yield | — | 3.31% |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
IWM (iShares Russell 2000 ETF) trades at $302.71, up 0.91% with a bullish technical signal from moving averages. The ETF, tracking 2,000 US small-cap stocks, shows strong institutional interest despite lacking traditional valuation ratios. Recent news highlights small-cap outperformance versus large caps, with institutional investors favoring IWM for its liquidity and options ecosystem. Technical indicators show RSI at 75 suggesting overbought conditions while ADX indicates a strong trend.
Outlook remains positive as small caps benefit from economic conditions, though high RSI suggests near-term consolidation risk. The ETF's broad small-cap exposure offers diversification but faces volatility from economic sensitivity. Institutional accumulation supports medium-term upside potential despite premium valuation concerns versus alternatives.
Nomura Holdings (NMR) trades at $9.925, up 1.07% on the day, with a bullish technical signal from moving averages and a neutral stance from oscillators. The company reported strong revenue growth, with 2025 revenue reaching $1.66 trillion and net income of $340.74 billion, yielding a net margin of 20.4%. Recent earnings show a mix of beats and misses, with Q2 2026 EPS beating expectations. Analyst consensus leans toward Hold, with 66.67% of coverage recommending Hold and 33.33% Buy.
The outlook for NMR is supported by robust profitability and valuation metrics like a P/E of 11.59, suggesting potential undervaluation. However, risks include inconsistent cash flow from operations, rising debt-to-asset ratios, and macroeconomic sensitivity. Investors should weigh solid fundamentals against cash flow volatility and debt trends for balanced decision-making.
Trailing returns across standard periods
Latest headlines on both assets
The ETF is designed to track the performance of the securities and the stocks in the Russell 2000 Index. To maintain the composition and weightings, the advisor adjusts the ETF from time to time to conform to periodic changes in the index target.
Read more on IWM →Nomura is Japan's largest broker, about twice the size of rival Daiwa Securities and roughly three times the size of the securities units of the three megabanks. It is also the largest asset-management company in Japan, with a similar size differential compared with its rivals. Despite its topnotch brand name in retail broking and asset management in Japan, Nomura has struggled to compete effectively in the institutional securities business against larger global rivals. In 2008, Nomura bought European and Asian assets of the failed Lehman Brothers, which led to a sharply higher cost base but did not provide commensurate revenue. Nomura has reduced the scale of these businesses but maintains its ambition to compete globally with the top players.
Read more on NMR →