Iron Mountain Inc vs ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd — how do they compare? Iron Mountain Inc trades at $114.51 (market cap $34.46B), while ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd trades at $29.99 (market cap $3.65B). The key difference: Iron Mountain Inc is far larger — about 9.4× ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd's market cap, and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd pays the higher dividend (20.16%). Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Iron Mountain Inc for 80 Days and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd for 27 Days on average.
| IRM | ZIM | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $34.46B | $3.65B |
Volume | 1,379,608 | 1,068,475 |
Sector | Real Estate | Industrials |
52-Week High | $133.06 | $30.51 |
52-Week Low | $78.86 | $12.44 |
Typical Hold Time | 80 Days | 27 Days |
Enterprise Value | $53.87B | $7.32B |
Dividend Yield | 2.99% | 20.16% |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Iron Mountain (IRM) trades at $112.97, down 2.38% with a bearish technical signal. The company shows strong revenue growth from $6.9B in 2025 to $7.6B projected for 2026, though net margins remain thin at 2.09%. Recent earnings beats and a 300MW data center pipeline expansion highlight growth initiatives. Analyst consensus is bullish with a $142.75 price target, representing 26% upside potential from current levels.
IRM offers compelling growth in data center and digital services but carries significant debt risk with 79.04% debt-to-asset ratio. The stock presents opportunity for investors seeking exposure to digital infrastructure expansion, though high leverage and thin margins require careful monitoring. Current technical weakness may provide entry points for long-term investors aligned with analyst optimism.
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services trades at $30.26, up 0.9% today and near its 52-week high of $30.96. The stock shows bullish technical momentum with strong moving average signals, though RSI indicators suggest potential overbought conditions. Fundamentally, Q2 2026 earnings beat expectations with $0.53 EPS versus -$0.02 expected, driven by 9% revenue growth to $1.8 billion. The company faces acquisition uncertainty with Hapag-Lloyd's $35 per share offer pending Israeli government approval.
Investment outlook remains mixed with strong operational performance offset by merger uncertainty. The stock trades at attractive valuations (P/S 0.57, P/B 0.94) but faces headwinds from declining 2026 profit margins (2.15% vs 6.94% in 2025). Analyst consensus leans cautious with 67% hold ratings, while technical indicators suggest near-term resistance at current levels. Key risks include government approval of acquisition and volatile shipping rates.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
Latest headlines on both assets
Iron Mountain Inc is a record management services provider. The firm is organized as a REIT. Most of its revenue comes from its storage business, with the rest coming from value-added services. The firm primarily caters to enterprise clients in developed markets. Its business segments include Global RIM Business
Read more on IRM →ZIM is a global container liner shipping company that employs a 'global-niche' strategy, focusing on specific trade lanes where it holds a competitive advantage. Unlike larger, asset-heavy competitors, ZIM operates an agile, charter-intensive fleet, allowing it to rapidly adjust capacity to market demand while prioritizing digitalization and specialized cargo like refrigerated (reefer) goods.
Read more on ZIM →