Iron Mountain Inc vs Zimmer Biomet Holdings Inc — how do they compare? Iron Mountain Inc trades at $114.22 (market cap $34.46B), while Zimmer Biomet Holdings Inc trades at $88.9 (market cap $16.95B). The key difference: Iron Mountain Inc is far larger — about 2× Zimmer Biomet Holdings Inc's market cap, and Iron Mountain Inc pays the higher dividend (2.99%). Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Iron Mountain Inc for 80 Days and Zimmer Biomet Holdings Inc for 89 Days on average.
| IRM | ZBH | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $34.46B | $16.95B |
Volume | 1,379,608 | 2,505,240 |
Sector | Real Estate | Health |
52-Week High | $133.06 | $103.98 |
52-Week Low | $78.86 | $79.58 |
Typical Hold Time | 80 Days | 89 Days |
Enterprise Value | $53.87B | $24.02B |
Dividend Yield | 2.99% | 1.08% |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Iron Mountain (IRM) trades at $115.73, down 0.66% on the day, with a bullish technical signal and strong institutional interest. The company has beaten EPS estimates for three consecutive quarters, with Q3 2026 results pending. Revenue growth is robust, climbing from $5.1B in 2022 to $6.9B in 2025, though net margins have compressed. Recent news highlights expansion in data centers and digital partnerships, including a 300MW pipeline and AI collaborations.
The outlook is supported by analyst consensus with a $142.75 price target (66.7% buy ratings), but high debt levels and elevated P/E of 82.09 pose risks. Earnings growth from digital initiatives is the key catalyst, while leverage and margin pressure require monitoring for sustained shareholder value.
Zimmer Biomet (ZBH) trades at $88.49, down 1.33% today, with a bearish technical signal despite recent earnings beats. The company shows steady revenue growth to $8.23B in 2025, though net margins have compressed from 13.84% in 2023 to 8.56%. Analyst consensus is mixed with 40% buy ratings but a $103.11 price target suggesting 16.5% upside. Recent news highlights dividend declarations and leadership promotions aimed at accelerating commercial transformation.
ZBH presents a value opportunity with reasonable valuation multiples (P/E 21.48, P/S 2.04) and consistent earnings outperformance, but faces headwinds from margin pressure and technical weakness. The stock's investment case hinges on execution of growth initiatives amid competitive and debt-related risks, with current levels offering entry near support.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
Latest headlines on both assets
Iron Mountain Inc is a record management services provider. The firm is organized as a REIT. Most of its revenue comes from its storage business, with the rest coming from value-added services. The firm primarily caters to enterprise clients in developed markets. Its business segments include Global RIM Business
Read more on IRM →Zimmer Biomet designs, manufactures, and markets orthopedic reconstructive implants, as well as supplies and surgical equipment for orthopedic surgery. With the acquisitions of Centerpulse in 2003 and Biomet in 2015, Zimmer holds the leading share of the reconstructive market in the United States, Europe, and Japan. Roughly 70% of total revenue is derived from sales of large joints, another quarter comes from extremities, trauma, and related surgical products.
Read more on ZBH →