Iron Mountain Inc vs Transocean Ltd — how do they compare? Iron Mountain Inc trades at $114.41 (market cap $34.46B), while Transocean Ltd trades at $5.55 (market cap $6.19B). The key difference: Iron Mountain Inc is far larger — about 5.6× Transocean Ltd's market cap, and Iron Mountain Inc pays a 2.99% dividend while Transocean Ltd pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Iron Mountain Inc for 80 Days and Transocean Ltd for 18 Days on average.
| IRM | RIG | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $34.46B | $6.19B |
Volume | 1,379,608 | 30,564,415 |
Sector | Real Estate | Energy |
52-Week High | $133.06 | $7.58 |
52-Week Low | $78.86 | $3.08 |
Typical Hold Time | 80 Days | 18 Days |
Enterprise Value | $53.87B | $10.80B |
Dividend Yield | 2.99% | — |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Iron Mountain (IRM) trades at $115.73, down 0.66% on the day, with a bullish technical signal and strong institutional interest. The company has beaten EPS estimates for three consecutive quarters, with Q3 2026 results pending. Revenue growth is robust, climbing from $5.1B in 2022 to $6.9B in 2025, though net margins have compressed. Recent news highlights expansion in data centers and digital partnerships, including a 300MW pipeline and AI collaborations.
The outlook is supported by analyst consensus with a $142.75 price target (66.7% buy ratings), but high debt levels and elevated P/E of 82.09 pose risks. Earnings growth from digital initiatives is the key catalyst, while leverage and margin pressure require monitoring for sustained shareholder value.
Transocean (RIG) trades at $5.595, up 3.8% with bullish technical signals despite mixed earnings. The company shows strong revenue growth to $4.1B in 2026 but remains unprofitable with a -40.24% net margin. Recent $80M and $300M contract wins boost backlog, while the $5.8B Valaris acquisition advances after DOJ approval. Cash flow improved with $995M operating cash in 2026, supporting deleveraging efforts amid high debt levels.
RIG offers speculative upside through offshore cycle leverage and contract growth, but high debt and persistent losses pose significant risks. Analyst consensus is divided with 39% buy ratings, reflecting optimism about cash flow improvement versus concerns over profitability and execution risks from major acquisitions.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
Latest headlines on both assets
Iron Mountain Inc is a record management services provider. The firm is organized as a REIT. Most of its revenue comes from its storage business, with the rest coming from value-added services. The firm primarily caters to enterprise clients in developed markets. Its business segments include Global RIM Business
Read more on IRM →Transocean Ltd. is a leading international provider of offshore contract drilling services for oil and gas wells. The company operates one of the world's most versatile fleets of mobile offshore drilling units, including ultra-deepwater drillships and harsh environment semi-submersibles. RIG's services are essential to energy exploration and production companies seeking to access deepwater and challenging reserves globally.
Read more on RIG →