Compare ING Groep NV (ING) vs Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
ING Groep NV vs Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF — how do they compare? ING Groep NV trades at $33.33 (market cap $93.76B), while Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF trades at $28.25 (market cap $335.90M). The key difference: ING Groep NV is far larger — about 279.1× Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's market cap, and ING Groep NV pays a 3.95% dividend while Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold ING Groep NV for 94 Days and Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF for 46 Days on average.
| ING | PBW | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $93.76B | $335.90M |
Volume | 4,620,220 | 628,890 |
Sector | Financials | Sector/Thematic |
52-Week High | $37.27 | $46.99 |
52-Week Low | $23.66 | $28.29 |
Typical Hold Time | 94 Days | 46 Days |
Enterprise Value | $236.48B | — |
Dividend Yield | 3.95% | — |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
ING stock trades at $33.28, down 1.89% today, with bearish technical signals despite strong fundamentals. The company has beaten earnings estimates for three consecutive quarters, maintains a 28.34% net income margin, and analysts show strong support with 11 buy ratings versus no sell ratings. Recent news highlights management's raised ROE target above 16% for 2027 and strategic focus on organic growth.
The investment case balances solid profitability and analyst optimism against technical weakness and cash flow challenges. Upside potential exists from earnings momentum and strategic initiatives, while risks include persistent negative operating cash flows and regulatory scrutiny in international markets.
PBW, the Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF, trades at $28.92, down 2.89% today amid a bearish technical signal from moving averages. The ETF's unique selection criteria prioritize ecological factors over financial metrics, resulting in concentrated exposure to the clean energy sector. Recent institutional selling, including a 96.3% reduction by IFP Advisors Inc. in Q2 2026 (SEC filing, September 18, 2026), reflects cautious sentiment despite long-term growth drivers like energy security and data center demand.
Outlook remains challenged by near-term volatility and sector underperformance versus broad markets, though global investment in clean energy offers structural tailwinds. Key risks include oil price swings, Fed policy impacts, and lack of diversification. Investors face a trade-off between speculative growth potential and elevated sensitivity to macroeconomic shifts.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
About ING Groep NV
The merger of the Dutch postal bank and NN Insurance in 1991 created ING. Through a series of further acquisitions ING build up a global footprint. The 2008 financial crisis forced ING to seek government support--a precondition of which was that ING should separate its banking and insurance activities, which saw ING revert to being solely a bank. ING has market- leading banking operations in the Netherlands and Belgium, and a range of digital banks across Europe and Australia. Its global wholesale banking operation is primarily focused on lending.
Read more on ING →About Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF
PBW is an equal-weighted ETF that invests in U.S. companies leading the clean energy transition. It focuses on renewable energy, power conservation, and sustainable technologies like solar, wind, and energy storage.
Read more on PBW →
