Compare iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) vs United States Natural Gas Fund (UNG) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF vs United States Natural Gas Fund — how do they compare? iShares Global Clean Energy ETF trades at $18.5, while United States Natural Gas Fund trades at $10.25. The key difference: iShares Global Clean Energy ETF is trading nearer its 52-week high, United States Natural Gas Fund nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| ICLN | UNG | |
|---|---|---|
52-Week High | $23.75 | $16.90 |
52-Week Low | $13.66 | $9.63 |
Sector | — | Commodities - Energy |
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
About iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
The index is designed to track the performance of approximately 100 clean energy-related companies. The fund generally invests at least 80% of its assets in the component securities of the target index. The index may invest up to 20% of its assets in certain futures, trading options and swap contracts, cash and cash equivalents, as well as in securities not included in the index. It is non-diversified.
Read more on ICLN →About United States Natural Gas Fund
UNG is a commodity ETF that tracks the daily price movements of natural gas futures. It primarily invests in front-month contracts at the Henry Hub, making it a highly volatile tool for short-term trading rather than long-term holding due to contango and roll costs.
Read more on UNG →
