iShares Global Clean Energy ETF vs Unilever plc — how do they compare? iShares Global Clean Energy ETF trades at $17.19 (market cap $2.27B), while Unilever plc trades at $61.89 (market cap $131.63B). The key difference: Unilever plc is far larger — about 58× iShares Global Clean Energy ETF's market cap, and Unilever plc pays a 3.43% dividend while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold iShares Global Clean Energy ETF for 87 Days and Unilever plc for 112 Days on average.
| ICLN | UL | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $2.27B | $131.63B |
Volume | 6,845,064 | 2,978,741 |
52-Week High | $23.75 | $74.59 |
52-Week Low | $15.78 | $55.05 |
Typical Hold Time | 87 Days | 112 Days |
Sector | — | Consumer Staples |
Enterprise Value | — | $156.65B |
Dividend Yield | — | 3.43% |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
ICLN trades at $17.17, down 0.81% with bearish technical signals from moving averages. The ETF shows neutral momentum oscillators but faces significant volatility compared to traditional energy peers. Recent news highlights ICLN's 57.2% maximum drawdown and higher expense ratio of 0.38% versus fossil fuel ETFs, though geopolitical tensions are driving renewed interest in renewable energy infrastructure.
The clean energy sector faces competitive pressure from higher-yielding traditional energy ETFs, but long-term growth prospects remain supported by global energy transition trends. Key risks include expense ratio disadvantages and sector volatility, while potential catalysts include increased renewable adoption driven by geopolitical and environmental factors.
Unilever (UL) trades at $60.98, up 0.3% on the day, amid a bearish technical outlook and mixed financial performance. Revenue declined to $50.50 billion in 2025, though net income improved to $9.47 billion, with a high net margin of 18.74%. Recent earnings have consistently missed expectations, while the company is streamlining its portfolio through a planned food business merger with McCormick, facing regulatory scrutiny.
The stock presents a cautious outlook with strong profitability metrics like a 54.56% ROE offset by valuation concerns (P/E of 21.59) and earnings misses. Risks include integration challenges from the McCormick deal and competitive pressures, but its focus on beauty and personal care offers growth potential in emerging markets.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
The index is designed to track the performance of approximately 100 clean energy-related companies. The fund generally invests at least 80% of its assets in the component securities of the target index. The index may invest up to 20% of its assets in certain futures, trading options and swap contracts, cash and cash equivalents, as well as in securities not included in the index. It is non-diversified.
Read more on ICLN →Unilever is a diversified personal product (42% of 2021 sales by value), home care (20%), and packaged food (38%) company. Its brands include Knorr soups and sauces, Hellmann's mayonnaise, Lipton teas, Axe and Dove skin products, and the TRESemme haircare brand. The firm has been acquisitive in recent years
Read more on UL →