Compare iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) vs Under Armour Inc Class A (UAA) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF vs Under Armour Inc Class A — how do they compare? iShares Global Clean Energy ETF trades at $17.19 (market cap $2.27B), while Under Armour Inc Class A trades at $4.9 (market cap $2.07B). The key difference: iShares Global Clean Energy ETF and Under Armour Inc Class A are close in size by market cap, and Under Armour Inc Class A is more actively traded (12,050,442 versus 6,845,064). Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold iShares Global Clean Energy ETF for 87 Days and Under Armour Inc Class A for 99 Days on average.
| ICLN | UAA | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $2.27B | $2.07B |
Volume | 6,845,064 | 12,050,442 |
52-Week High | $23.75 | $8.14 |
52-Week Low | $15.78 | $4.17 |
Typical Hold Time | 87 Days | 99 Days |
Sector | — | Consumer Cyclical |
Enterprise Value | — | $3.05B |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
ICLN trades at $17.17, down 0.81% with bearish technical signals from moving averages. The ETF shows neutral momentum oscillators but faces significant volatility compared to traditional energy peers. Recent news highlights ICLN's 57.2% maximum drawdown and higher expense ratio of 0.38% versus fossil fuel ETFs, though geopolitical tensions are driving renewed interest in renewable energy infrastructure.
The clean energy sector faces competitive pressure from higher-yielding traditional energy ETFs, but long-term growth prospects remain supported by global energy transition trends. Key risks include expense ratio disadvantages and sector volatility, while potential catalysts include increased renewable adoption driven by geopolitical and environmental factors.
Under Armour (UAA) trades at $4.82, down 1.23% on the day, with a mixed technical picture showing a bullish overall signal but a neutral RSI. The company reported a net loss of $201.27 million in 2025, with revenue declining to $5.16 billion, though recent quarters have shown some earnings beats. Analyst consensus is a $5.79 price target, but the stock faces headwinds from weak consumer demand and negative cash flow trends.
The outlook is cautious; while cost discipline supports margins, persistent revenue weakness and negative profitability pose significant risks. The stock's low P/S ratio of 0.42 may attract value investors, but sustained operational improvements are needed for a durable recovery amid competitive pressures.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
About iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
The index is designed to track the performance of approximately 100 clean energy-related companies. The fund generally invests at least 80% of its assets in the component securities of the target index. The index may invest up to 20% of its assets in certain futures, trading options and swap contracts, cash and cash equivalents, as well as in securities not included in the index. It is non-diversified.
Read more on ICLN →About Under Armour Inc Class A
Under Armour develops, markets, and distributes athletic apparel, footwear, and accessories in North America and other territories. Consumers of its apparel include professional and amateur athletes, sponsored college and professional teams, and people with active lifestyles. The company sells merchandise through direct-to-consumer, including e-commerce and more than 400 combined factory house and brand house stores, and wholesale channels. Under Armour also operates a digital fitness app called MapMyFitness. The Baltimore-based company was founded in 1996.
Read more on UAA →
