Compare iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) vs Under Armour Inc Class A (UAA) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF vs Under Armour Inc Class A — how do they compare? iShares Global Clean Energy ETF trades at $18.43, while Under Armour Inc Class A trades at $5.33 (market cap $2.23B). The key difference: iShares Global Clean Energy ETF is trading nearer its 52-week high, Under Armour Inc Class A nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| ICLN | UAA | |
|---|---|---|
52-Week High | $23.75 | $8.14 |
52-Week Low | $13.66 | $4.17 |
Market Cap | — | $2.23B |
Sector | — | Consumer Cyclical |
Enterprise Value | — | $3.21B |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
ICLN, the iShares Global Clean Energy ETF, trades at $18.41, up 1.83% today, but technical indicators signal a bearish trend with moving averages and overall momentum pointing lower. The fund provides exposure to 105 global renewable energy companies, though key valuation and profitability ratios are not publicly disclosed for the ETF itself. Recent news highlights strong 2026 performance with over 25% gains, driven by global energy security concerns and data center power demand, though it faces competition from traditional energy ETFs offering lower fees and higher yields.
The outlook for ICLN is mixed; clean energy tailwinds from policy support and electrification trends offer growth potential, but risks include regulatory hurdles, fee competitiveness, and volatility. Analyst sentiment is cautious due to fee comparisons and policy dependence, with institutional interest balanced against outperformance of alternatives like uranium ETFs. Investment suitability hinges on appetite for clean energy sector volatility versus stable income.
Under Armour (UAA) is trading at $5.245, down 10.49% today, reflecting ongoing challenges with revenue declines and negative profitability. The stock shows bearish technical signals with oversold RSI readings, while fundamentals reveal a net loss of -$201.27M in 2025 and negative cash flow trends. Recent Q1 2027 earnings beat expectations but revealed weaker revenue and cautious guidance, with management maintaining profitability outlook despite sales headwinds.
The outlook remains challenging with declining revenues and negative margins, though current valuation metrics appear reasonable. Key risks include weak North American demand and competitive pressures, while potential catalysts include new product collaborations and cost management. Analyst consensus is mixed with 27% buy ratings but a $6.67 price target suggesting 27% upside from current levels.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
About iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
The index is designed to track the performance of approximately 100 clean energy-related companies. The fund generally invests at least 80% of its assets in the component securities of the target index. The index may invest up to 20% of its assets in certain futures, trading options and swap contracts, cash and cash equivalents, as well as in securities not included in the index. It is non-diversified.
Read more on ICLN →About Under Armour Inc Class A
Under Armour develops, markets, and distributes athletic apparel, footwear, and accessories in North America and other territories. Consumers of its apparel include professional and amateur athletes, sponsored college and professional teams, and people with active lifestyles. The company sells merchandise through direct-to-consumer, including e-commerce and more than 400 combined factory house and brand house stores, and wholesale channels. Under Armour also operates a digital fitness app called MapMyFitness. The Baltimore-based company was founded in 1996.
Read more on UAA →
