Investment
Features
FeesSafety
Academy
More
Pluang+

Compare iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) vs Thomson Reuters Corp (TRI) Price & Performance

iShares Global Clean Energy ETFTrade
Thomson Reuters CorpTrade

Price performance (Past 24H)

Key statistics

iShares Global Clean Energy ETF vs Thomson Reuters Corp — how do they compare? iShares Global Clean Energy ETF trades at $17.2 (market cap $2.27B), while Thomson Reuters Corp trades at $102.4 (market cap $43.89B). The key difference: Thomson Reuters Corp is far larger — about 19.3× iShares Global Clean Energy ETF's market cap, and Thomson Reuters Corp pays a 2.58% dividend while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold iShares Global Clean Energy ETF for 87 Days and Thomson Reuters Corp for 63 Days on average.

ICLNTRI
Market Cap
$2.27B$43.89B
Volume
6,845,0641,648,199
52-Week High
$23.75$163.45
52-Week Low
$15.78$76.55
Typical Hold Time
87 Days63 Days
Sector
—Industrials
Enterprise Value
—$46.51B
Dividend Yield
—2.58%

Aura AI Summary

Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice

iShares Global Clean Energy ETF

ICLN trades at $17.17, down 0.81% with bearish technical signals from moving averages. The ETF shows neutral momentum oscillators but faces significant volatility compared to traditional energy peers. Recent news highlights ICLN's 57.2% maximum drawdown and higher expense ratio of 0.38% versus fossil fuel ETFs, though geopolitical tensions are driving renewed interest in renewable energy infrastructure.

The clean energy sector faces competitive pressure from higher-yielding traditional energy ETFs, but long-term growth prospects remain supported by global energy transition trends. Key risks include expense ratio disadvantages and sector volatility, while potential catalysts include increased renewable adoption driven by geopolitical and environmental factors.

Thomson Reuters Corp

Thomson Reuters (TRI) trades at $101.52, up 2.26% today, with bullish technical signals and strong analyst support. The company shows solid fundamentals with 10% organic growth in core businesses and a 21.22% net income margin. Recent strategic moves include divesting its printing unit and launching a proprietary AI model, positioning TRI for tech-focused growth. Cash flow trends show operational strength despite recent negative net cash flow due to strategic investments.

TRI presents a compelling investment case with analyst consensus target of $133.25 (31% upside), supported by recurring revenue growth and AI expansion. Risks include cybersecurity incidents and execution challenges in tech transformation. The stock's current valuation at 26.75 P/E appears reasonable given growth prospects, making it attractive for long-term investors seeking exposure to content and technology services.

Returns comparison

Trailing returns across standard periods

Investor sentiment on Pluang

What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days

ICLN
100% Buy0% Sell
Avg holding period · 87 Days
TRI

No sentiment data available yet.

About iShares Global Clean Energy ETF

The index is designed to track the performance of approximately 100 clean energy-related companies. The fund generally invests at least 80% of its assets in the component securities of the target index. The index may invest up to 20% of its assets in certain futures, trading options and swap contracts, cash and cash equivalents, as well as in securities not included in the index. It is non-diversified.

Read more on ICLN →

About Thomson Reuters Corp

Thomson Reuters is the result of the $17.6 billion megamerger of Canada's Thomson and the United Kingdom's Reuters Group in 2008 and the 2018 carve-out of its finance and risk business, Refinitiv, in which it holds a 45% stake. In 2019, the company agreed to exchange its 45% stake in Refinitiv for a 15% stake in LSE, which closed in early 2021. Since the divestiture, the company is more concentrated on selling its flagship legal data and software, Westlaw, and its tax accounting software, Onesource. Reuters sees roughly 80% of revenue and 70% of expenses attributed to the United States, while the remainder (largely through the global print and Reuters News segments) is distributed across Latin America, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia-Pacific.

Read more on TRI →