Compare iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) vs Smith & Nephew plc (SNN) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF vs Smith & Nephew plc — how do they compare? iShares Global Clean Energy ETF trades at $18.5, while Smith & Nephew plc trades at $30.05 (market cap $12.54B). The key difference: Smith & Nephew plc pays a 2.65% dividend while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF pays none, and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF is trading nearer its 52-week high, Smith & Nephew plc nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| ICLN | SNN | |
|---|---|---|
52-Week High | $23.75 | $38.70 |
52-Week Low | $13.66 | $28.73 |
Market Cap | — | $12.54B |
Sector | — | Health |
Enterprise Value | — | $15.57B |
Dividend Yield | — | 2.65% |
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
About iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
The index is designed to track the performance of approximately 100 clean energy-related companies. The fund generally invests at least 80% of its assets in the component securities of the target index. The index may invest up to 20% of its assets in certain futures, trading options and swap contracts, cash and cash equivalents, as well as in securities not included in the index. It is non-diversified.
Read more on ICLN →About Smith & Nephew plc
Smith & Nephew designs, manufactures, and markets orthopedic devices, sports medicine and arthroscopic technologies, and wound-care solutions. Roughly 42% of the U.K.-based firm's revenue comes from orthopedic products, and another 30% is sports medicine and ENT. The remaining 28% of revenue is from the advanced wound therapy segment. Roughly half of Smith & Nephew's total revenue comes from the United States, just over 30% is from other developed markets, and emerging markets account for the remainder.
Read more on SNN →
