iShares Global Clean Energy ETF vs VanEck Rare Earth/Strategic Metals — how do they compare? iShares Global Clean Energy ETF trades at $18.6, while VanEck Rare Earth/Strategic Metals trades at $77.52. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| ICLN | REMX | |
|---|---|---|
52-Week High | $23.75 | $109.53 |
52-Week Low | $13.66 | $56.60 |
Sector | — | Sector/Thematic |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
ICLN trades at $18.69, up 3.37% today, but technical indicators signal a bearish trend with moving averages showing 11 sell signals versus 2 buy signals. The ETF faces headwinds from higher expense ratios compared to traditional energy peers and regulatory uncertainty around renewable energy permits. Recent news highlights clean energy's 25% gains in 2026 but notes volatility concerns versus fossil fuel alternatives.
The outlook remains cautious as policy risks and competitive pressure from lower-cost energy ETFs challenge near-term performance. Long-term growth potential exists from global clean energy adoption, but investors face volatility and fee disadvantages relative to traditional energy funds.
No Aura AI signal available yet.
Trailing returns across standard periods
The index is designed to track the performance of approximately 100 clean energy-related companies. The fund generally invests at least 80% of its assets in the component securities of the target index. The index may invest up to 20% of its assets in certain futures, trading options and swap contracts, cash and cash equivalents, as well as in securities not included in the index. It is non-diversified.
Read more on ICLN →REMX invests in global companies involved in producing, refining, and recycling rare earth and strategic metals. It provides targeted exposure to critical minerals used in high-tech and green energy, with top holdings like Albemarle and Pilbara Minerals.
Read more on REMX →