iShares Global Clean Energy ETF vs VanEck Rare Earth/Strategic Metals — how do they compare? iShares Global Clean Energy ETF trades at $17.21 (market cap $2.27B), while VanEck Rare Earth/Strategic Metals trades at $60.8 (market cap $1.75B). The key difference: iShares Global Clean Energy ETF is the larger of the two by market cap, and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF is trading nearer its 52-week high, VanEck Rare Earth/Strategic Metals nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold iShares Global Clean Energy ETF for 87 Days and VanEck Rare Earth/Strategic Metals for 50 Days on average.
| ICLN | REMX | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $2.27B | $1.75B |
Volume | 6,845,064 | 930,523 |
52-Week High | $23.75 | $109.53 |
52-Week Low | $15.78 | $60.58 |
Typical Hold Time | 87 Days | 50 Days |
Sector | — | Sector/Thematic |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
ICLN trades at $17.17, down 0.81% with bearish technical signals from moving averages. The ETF shows neutral momentum oscillators but faces significant volatility compared to traditional energy peers. Recent news highlights ICLN's 57.2% maximum drawdown and higher expense ratio of 0.38% versus fossil fuel ETFs, though geopolitical tensions are driving renewed interest in renewable energy infrastructure.
The clean energy sector faces competitive pressure from higher-yielding traditional energy ETFs, but long-term growth prospects remain supported by global energy transition trends. Key risks include expense ratio disadvantages and sector volatility, while potential catalysts include increased renewable adoption driven by geopolitical and environmental factors.
REMX (VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF) trades at $61.88, down 2.99% with bearish technical signals dominating. The ETF faces pressure from rare earth sector volatility and mixed performance among constituent companies. Technical indicators show oversold conditions with RSI readings below 23, while ADX signals strong bearish momentum. Recent news highlights sector challenges including China's export controls and shifting trade policies affecting critical minerals.
The rare earth sector faces structural headwinds despite strategic importance. While U.S. supply chain development offers long-term potential, high volatility (~50% annualized) and China concentration pose significant risks. Current technical weakness suggests cautious approach until fundamental catalysts emerge from constituent company developments or policy shifts.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Latest headlines on both assets
The index is designed to track the performance of approximately 100 clean energy-related companies. The fund generally invests at least 80% of its assets in the component securities of the target index. The index may invest up to 20% of its assets in certain futures, trading options and swap contracts, cash and cash equivalents, as well as in securities not included in the index. It is non-diversified.
Read more on ICLN →REMX invests in global companies involved in producing, refining, and recycling rare earth and strategic metals. It provides targeted exposure to critical minerals used in high-tech and green energy, with top holdings like Albemarle and Pilbara Minerals.
Read more on REMX →