iShares Global Clean Energy ETF vs Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF — how do they compare? iShares Global Clean Energy ETF trades at $17.28 (market cap $2.30B), while Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF trades at $28.29 (market cap $347.46M). The key difference: iShares Global Clean Energy ETF is far larger — about 6.6× Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's market cap, and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF is trading nearer its 52-week high, Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold iShares Global Clean Energy ETF for 87 Days and Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF for 46 Days on average.
| ICLN | PBW | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $2.30B | $347.46M |
Volume | 3,661,617 | 413,698 |
52-Week High | $23.75 | $46.99 |
52-Week Low | $15.78 | $28.29 |
Typical Hold Time | 87 Days | 46 Days |
Sector | — | Sector/Thematic |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
ICLN trades at $17.31, down 1.31% with a bearish technical signal from moving averages. The ETF faces volatility with clean energy exposure showing deeper drawdowns compared to traditional energy peers. Recent news highlights competitive pressure from fossil fuel ETFs delivering stronger returns and lower fees, though geopolitical tensions are accelerating global renewable energy adoption.
The outlook remains challenged by high expense ratios and sector volatility, but long-term growth potential exists from global energy transition trends. Key risks include competitive pressure from traditional energy and execution challenges in renewable adoption timelines.
PBW, the Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF, trades at $28.92, down 2.89% today amid a bearish technical signal from moving averages. The ETF's unique selection criteria prioritize ecological factors over financial metrics, resulting in concentrated exposure to the clean energy sector. Recent institutional selling, including a 96.3% reduction by IFP Advisors Inc. in Q2 2026 (SEC filing, September 18, 2026), reflects cautious sentiment despite long-term growth drivers like energy security and data center demand.
Outlook remains challenged by near-term volatility and sector underperformance versus broad markets, though global investment in clean energy offers structural tailwinds. Key risks include oil price swings, Fed policy impacts, and lack of diversification. Investors face a trade-off between speculative growth potential and elevated sensitivity to macroeconomic shifts.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
The index is designed to track the performance of approximately 100 clean energy-related companies. The fund generally invests at least 80% of its assets in the component securities of the target index. The index may invest up to 20% of its assets in certain futures, trading options and swap contracts, cash and cash equivalents, as well as in securities not included in the index. It is non-diversified.
Read more on ICLN →PBW is an equal-weighted ETF that invests in U.S. companies leading the clean energy transition. It focuses on renewable energy, power conservation, and sustainable technologies like solar, wind, and energy storage.
Read more on PBW →