iShares Global Clean Energy ETF vs Otis Worldwide Corp — how do they compare? iShares Global Clean Energy ETF trades at $17.2 (market cap $2.27B), while Otis Worldwide Corp trades at $66.13 (market cap $25.17B). The key difference: Otis Worldwide Corp is far larger — about 11.1× iShares Global Clean Energy ETF's market cap, and Otis Worldwide Corp pays a 2.66% dividend while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold iShares Global Clean Energy ETF for 87 Days and Otis Worldwide Corp for 65 Days on average.
| ICLN | OTIS | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $2.27B | $25.17B |
Volume | 6,845,064 | 4,542,442 |
52-Week High | $23.75 | $93.62 |
52-Week Low | $15.78 | $64.05 |
Typical Hold Time | 87 Days | 65 Days |
Sector | — | Industrials |
Enterprise Value | — | $33.20B |
Dividend Yield | — | 2.66% |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
ICLN trades at $17.17, down 0.81% with bearish technical signals from moving averages. The ETF shows neutral momentum oscillators but faces significant volatility compared to traditional energy peers. Recent news highlights ICLN's 57.2% maximum drawdown and higher expense ratio of 0.38% versus fossil fuel ETFs, though geopolitical tensions are driving renewed interest in renewable energy infrastructure.
The clean energy sector faces competitive pressure from higher-yielding traditional energy ETFs, but long-term growth prospects remain supported by global energy transition trends. Key risks include expense ratio disadvantages and sector volatility, while potential catalysts include increased renewable adoption driven by geopolitical and environmental factors.
Otis Worldwide trades at $65.74, down 1.07% with a bearish technical signal and recent earnings misses. The stock trades near its 52-week low with mixed analyst sentiment (46.7% buy, 46.7% hold) despite a consensus price target of $87.00. Revenue growth remains stable at $14.43B (2025) with 10.17% net margins, though service margins face pressure from labor costs. Recent CEO succession news and China project wins provide strategic context amid weak equipment demand.
The outlook balances stable service revenue against margin pressures and China exposure. Upside exists if service margins recover and modernization backlog converts, but near-term headwinds and technical weakness suggest cautious positioning. Key risks include prolonged China weakness and execution on cost controls.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
Latest headlines on both assets
The index is designed to track the performance of approximately 100 clean energy-related companies. The fund generally invests at least 80% of its assets in the component securities of the target index. The index may invest up to 20% of its assets in certain futures, trading options and swap contracts, cash and cash equivalents, as well as in securities not included in the index. It is non-diversified.
Read more on ICLN →Otis is the largest global elevator and escalator supplier by revenue with around one quarter of share excluding Japan. In 1854 Otis' founder and namesake, Elisha Graves Otis, invented a safety mechanism that prevented elevators from falling if the hoisting cable failed.The company's product and service lifecycle begins with installations of elevator units in new buildings, later selling maintenance services on the units, and eventually replacement of the units after the average 15-20 year useful life of an elevator. As the largest global OEM, over decades Otis has built a base of 2 million elevators under service. Its business model is much the same as that of its competitors Kone, Schindler, and Thyssenkrupp.
Read more on OTIS →