iShares Global Clean Energy ETF vs NetEase Inc — how do they compare? iShares Global Clean Energy ETF trades at $18.62, while NetEase Inc trades at $122.96 (market cap $82.75B). The key difference: NetEase Inc pays a 2.36% dividend while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF pays none, and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF is trading nearer its 52-week high, NetEase Inc nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| ICLN | NTES | |
|---|---|---|
52-Week High | $23.75 | $159.34 |
52-Week Low | $13.66 | $109.26 |
Market Cap | — | $82.75B |
Sector | — | Media |
Enterprise Value | — | $59.05B |
Dividend Yield | — | 2.36% |
Trailing returns across standard periods
The index is designed to track the performance of approximately 100 clean energy-related companies. The fund generally invests at least 80% of its assets in the component securities of the target index. The index may invest up to 20% of its assets in certain futures, trading options and swap contracts, cash and cash equivalents, as well as in securities not included in the index. It is non-diversified.
Read more on ICLN →NetEase, which started on an internet portal service in 1997, is a leading online services provider in China. Its key services include online/mobile games, cloud music, media, advertising, email, live streaming, online education, and e-commerce. The company develops and operates some of the China's most popular PC client and mobile games, and it partners with global leading game developers, such as Blizzard Entertainment and Mojang (a Microsoft subsidiary).
Read more on NTES →